Well
quote:
Note that mean fitness is calculated as a mean over the set of individuals, in contrast to the fundamental theorem of biology (Fisher, 1930) where mean fitness is calculated over the set of genes leading to a dubious teorem.
why can't your distribution be derived from some division of genes distributed PER individual. Without THAT it seems that though your idea is well designed it might be more proof against ID than for Creationism etc.
To me the difficulty in doing this comes from having to keep in sync 4 DIFFERENT hierarchies
A)Transfinite GENERATING a finitary list of real number groups
B)Tracks,Nodes,Main Massings, Baselines GENERATING a finite list of baselines
C)Ecosystem Engineered Populations GENERATING an actual list of species
D)Phenomenological Monohierarchies GENERATING a divided place other than Boltzman listing differences of macrothermodynamics and hierarchical thermodynamics
If all four hierarchies were logically related(other than independently listed as I did), it seems to me that your notion might apply to genes and individuals in the same structure.
This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 04-18-2006 07:03 AM