Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Chimpanzee-human genetic gap
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5062 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 221 of 244 (282961)
01-31-2006 6:11 PM
Reply to: Message 220 by Cold Foreign Object
01-31-2006 5:58 PM


Re: Another attempt at agreement
H,
I'll edit the quote back in but I found that Wright made an interesting comment on g-homeostasis in my recent reading
EvC Forum: The Theory of Gene Frequencies by S.Wright
making it something questionable when compared to any thing similar. Perhaps this was how Mayr managed to be deragoatory on the topic?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 220 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 01-31-2006 5:58 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 224 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 01-31-2006 9:25 PM Brad McFall has replied

  
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5062 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 244 of 244 (283923)
02-04-2006 2:27 PM
Reply to: Message 224 by Cold Foreign Object
01-31-2006 9:25 PM


Re: Another attempt at agreement
quote:
From the nature of error, the conception of which, as we have observed, includes as an essential element besides falisty the appearance of truth, there results the following important rule for the truth of our knowledge. In order to avoid errors - and no error is absolutely unavoidable, although it may be relatively so in cases where we cannot avoid judging even at the risk of falling into error - in order , then, to avoid errors we must try to discover and explain their source, namely, semblance.
quote:
I Kant Introduction to Logic p 47
If Mayr had used the analogy of the lethal in Lerner’s comparison between genetic and organismic homeostasis
EvC Forum: Is genetic homeostasis a barrier to 'macro' evolution?
then Wright’s reading of homeostasis
EvC Forum: The Theory of Gene Frequencies by S.Wright
remains but Mayr only expressed a semblance. I would have to verify this from Mayr’s writing directly. It is possible Mayr was operating with a different concept that lead him to misdegrade homeostasis. I have not investigated that directly however it appears Mayr was off the mark.
I will try to show how the two "squares"(or rectangles) I drew here
can retain where Mayr may have misentrained a discreteness that actually is the continuity of the butterfly catastrophe,
Butterfly Catastrophe -- from Wolfram MathWorld
Pages perso Orange - Domaine obsolte
thus providing a statistical breach that may be causal but might be an artifact of trying to dissect morphologies with cardinal rather than ordinal numbers. I will pick this up either in the thread on original sex or genetic homeostasis or in a thread on Wright.
This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 02-04-2006 02:28 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 224 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 01-31-2006 9:25 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024