Chimpanzee-human genetic gap

Again, how can one species turn into another without being able to breed with that species? Evolutionists are thus claiming that:1) brown-eyed genes can turn into blue-eyed genes on their own.
2) The gene for 4 legs can turn into the gene for 2 legs on its own.
3) The gene for brown or black hair can turn into the gene for blond hair on its own.
4) The gene to be able to talk develops on its own.
5) The gene to be able to form complex analyses develops on its own.
6) The gene to be able to build enormous structures develops on its own.All of the above contradicts the natural process of reproduction and instead, replaces it with the notion that animals don't need to breed with each other in order to pass along genes that they didn't acquire from a mate. Those genes can just themselves change into the genes of another species.Not only is this preposterous, but embarrassing to scientists as well. Either that, or evolutionists are suggesting bestiality between humans and apes because mating and breeding are the only way that one species can acquire the traits of another. They don't just magically appear. In fact, the word; "evolution" according to evolutionists means "change." Therefore, evolutionists are claiming that the genes of one species can simply change into the genes of another species on their own which contradicts the natural breeding process.There are countless websites on the internet of scientists who are coming out against the theory of evolution. One such website is:http://www.scienceagainstevolution.org.They see the impossibility of the theory and are now declaring it a hoax. But the tragedy is that since so many people cannot think things through on their own, they have to look to scientists to see what they should believe. So when these scientists declare evolution a hoax, then it remains to be seen how many people will stick with the evolution theory or follow the scientists. That will show how little faith people had in the theory to begin with.

Sorry, but the genetic gap is the fact that apes and humans cannot exchange genes. So my post explains the gentic gap perfectly. Just because you don't want to hear the explanation doesn't at all mean it doesn't apply. Thank you.

They're repetive because they answer every question on this thread. Since it is impossible for one species to turn into another without being able to breed with that species, then all of the questions in this category can be answered by that one simple fact. But since evolutionists either don't know that one species can't turn into another without being able to breed with that species, then it bears repeating until they can see that reality. Then there will be no need for useless debates. Thank you.

Sorry, but you can try to get rid of my posts through anyway that suits your fancy, attack me, say they don't apply, or whatever you like. But it cannot change the fact that one species cannot turn into another without being able to breed with that species. So your attempts to squelch my posts are a waste of time. Sorry.This message has been edited by Carico, 12-22-2005 11:10 AM

Then please prove that one species can turn into another species without being able to interbreed and there won't be any problem. Otherwise your attacks on me are completely unwarranted. Thank you.

I'm trying to understand the theory but the replies to me are always contradictory. If someone could make a statement that they don't take back, then this would all be quite simple. So again, do evolutionists believe that one species can turn into another species without being able to breed with that species? Yes or no. It's a very simple question to which a simple answer will suffice. If the answer is yes,please provide proof that this happens in reality, i.e. cats turning into dogs without breeding with dogs, giraffes turing into monkeys without breeding with monkeys. Anc calling a human an ape will not answer the qestion because we are as incapable of breeding with apes as giraffes are. If not, then how are you not suggesting bestiality between apes and humans? Thank you.This message has been edited by Carico, 12-23-2005 09:06 AM

Sorry, I didn't see this message. I thought we were talking about the genetic gap between humans and chimpanzees. I explained why it's there. But apparently this thread is about something else other than what it is entitled. It also appears that I have to agree with the contradictions on this thread in order to post on it because my posts are completely relevant to this topic. And the reason for the conflict between me and others on this thread is that they have no understanding of why one species cannot turn into another without being able to breed with that species. And until they understand that, we will always disagree. This will therefore, be my last reply to this thread.

I'm up for it as long as you don't take back statements and contradict yourself. You either claim that one species can turn into another without being able to breed with that species, or you claim that apes and humans can interbreed, because one or the other is how a human can come from an ape. So once you pick your scenario, you need to stick with it or the debate is over. We also need to agree on what a species is and I will stick with the Oxford American Dictionary and Thesaurus which claims that one species has to be able to breed with its members or they are not the same species. So if you can provide proof that a species can simply change or "evolve" into another species without being able to breed with that species, I'd like to see that proof because it's never been witnessed anywhere in reality.