Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,904 Year: 4,161/9,624 Month: 1,032/974 Week: 359/286 Day: 2/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Chimpanzee-human genetic gap
Darwin's Terrier
Inactive Member


Message 35 of 244 (261813)
11-21-2005 6:46 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by Cold Foreign Object
11-18-2005 8:54 PM


The Creationist model is better supported.
Please, then, state this model plainly.
Any similarity supports one Almighty Creator working from a common design.
Sure. That's why the bozo gave chimps, too, an appendix, a coccyx, a recurrent laryngeal nerve and inverted retinas.
Presumably, then, finding differences supports numerous creators working from different designs? We've got one designer doing cephalopod eyes and another doing vertebrate ones; one designer for bat lungs and another for bird lungs; one working on horizontal tail flukes for cetaceans while another designed vertical ones for ichthyosaurs.
Your error is the assumption that similarity = evidence for the resolve. Its also called rhetoric.
What about the nested hierarchy of similarities? It's also called cladistics.
Human evolution is absurd - an extraordinary claim lacking any credible evidence much less extraordinary evidence.
Please do not confuse your lack of familiarity with the evidence with the evidence being lacking.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 11-18-2005 8:54 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 11-22-2005 8:06 PM Darwin's Terrier has replied

  
Darwin's Terrier
Inactive Member


Message 37 of 244 (262624)
11-23-2005 4:50 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by Cold Foreign Object
11-22-2005 8:06 PM


Hello Ray
This is Ray Martinez/Willowtree
Well well well. Still plugging away, eh?
Me too.
I want everyone to know that Darwin's Terrier is my all time favorite Darwinist. He can be charmingly funny while he attempts to refute and tear you apart.
Thanks, but I take exception to "attempts".
Where have you been ?
Moderating IIDB's E/C board, mostly.
How are you ?
Tickety-boo. Yourself?
IF I remember correctly, the LAST time you and I mixed it up at another site....oh yeah....I remember....don't you ? DT...you DO remember don't you ? Tell me you remember what happened the last time we had intercourse ?
Well I remember that you got banned from IIDB "for repeated insults and violations of the rules", if that's what you mean. I remember that you tended to go in for nitpicking your opponent, while consistently engaging in ad hominem attacks that often required editing. I'll check back; I'm afraid that while I never forget a screen name, creationists tend to blur together after a while.
The Creationist Model is:
What the Bible says (when it is ascertained what that is) plainly corresponds with reality = fact.
Yup, same old Willow. Refuses to learn from anything we evilushunists say. And I seem to remember that "[we] have all lost your minds"; are "bored gossips", "atheists ass kissing other atheists", possibly "on drugs", and apparently "invulnerable to common sense".
For example: Genesis says God created Adamkind = perfectly corresponds with reality. Can't see design ? The Bible explains why some cannot but that is another subject.
Nice. And I maintain that as Ymir slept, sweating, a man and a woman grew under his left arm, and one of his legs begot a son with the other. But then, I prefer Snorri Sturluson to Moses.
If this is reality, you'll have some evidence of it then, yes?
Glad to see you DT. Oh yeah...I just remembered what happened the last time you and I debated.....as we say in America: "your secret is safe".
I shall have to check back further than your profile at IIDB, as I do not recall having any secrets.
PS: If you forgot just ask your friend Graculus - it was a three-way remember....we both took turns....remember ?
No, like I say, you all tend to blur, with only the most ludicrous claims (eg Karl Crawford's fireflies lighting the Ark) or notable insults to differentiate you by. Can't remember what makes you stand out, apart from retracting an admission of defeat, but that was here. I'll browse through those threads.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 11-22-2005 8:06 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by ringo, posted 11-23-2005 11:33 AM Darwin's Terrier has not replied
 Message 43 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 11-26-2005 2:22 PM Darwin's Terrier has not replied

  
Darwin's Terrier
Inactive Member


Message 38 of 244 (262631)
11-23-2005 5:44 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by Cold Foreign Object
11-22-2005 8:06 PM


IF I remember correctly, the LAST time you and I mixed it up at another site....oh yeah....I remember....don't you ? DT...you DO remember don't you ? Tell me you remember what happened the last time we had intercourse ?
[...]
Glad to see you DT. Oh yeah...I just remembered what happened the last time you and I debated.....as we say in America: "your secret is safe".
[...]
PS: If you forgot just ask your friend Graculus - it was a three-way remember....we both took turns....remember ?
Ah yes, the time I had my arse handed me... for underestimating the quantity of hominin fossils the previous year. Yes, I admit it, I was totally routed and had to drag my sorry ass to church the next day. [/sarcasm]
For details, see: Oops! We ran into some problems. | Internet Infidels Discussion Board . See, folks, in Willow / Ray's own strange version of reality, he thinks he won that one. I recommend that thread to anyone interested in debating Ray / Willowtree / Herepton, and more generally, as it contains some fine posts by, eg, Per Ahlberg.
TTFN, Oolon / DT
This message has been edited by Darwin's Terrier, 11-23-2005 06:05 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 11-22-2005 8:06 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by macaroniandcheese, posted 11-23-2005 4:04 PM Darwin's Terrier has not replied
 Message 41 by arachnophilia, posted 11-23-2005 4:05 PM Darwin's Terrier has replied

  
Darwin's Terrier
Inactive Member


Message 42 of 244 (263035)
11-25-2005 6:10 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by arachnophilia
11-23-2005 4:05 PM


Re: arguing with willowtree
Hadn't seen it -- I've been almost exclusively at IIDB for quite a while -- but thanks. Yep, par for the course with Ray, it seems...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by arachnophilia, posted 11-23-2005 4:05 PM arachnophilia has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024