Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A proof against ID and Creationism
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 222 of 300 (284251)
02-05-2006 7:34 PM
Reply to: Message 221 by inkorrekt
02-05-2006 7:10 PM


Re: No creator, but science
For starters, what is the scientific basis for ID?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 221 by inkorrekt, posted 02-05-2006 7:10 PM inkorrekt has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 223 by inkorrekt, posted 02-06-2006 12:04 PM nwr has replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 227 of 300 (284400)
02-06-2006 12:46 PM
Reply to: Message 223 by inkorrekt
02-06-2006 12:04 PM


Re: No creator, but science
Intelligent Design. If you can understand intelligence and Design, then you have the answer.
I asked for a scientific answer. Just giving us a couple of words doesn't do it.
If you could show us the designer in action, you might be making a start. Without evidence, all we have is your empty assertion that it is intelligent design.
But, Steve Jobs is lot more intelligent than me. Because, he DESIGNED the first apple computer.
We can find a lot of evidence on who designed the first apple. Where is the comparable evidence for the ID thesis?

Impeach Bush

This message is a reply to:
 Message 223 by inkorrekt, posted 02-06-2006 12:04 PM inkorrekt has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 246 by inkorrekt, posted 02-18-2006 2:43 AM nwr has replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 249 of 300 (288077)
02-18-2006 12:05 PM
Reply to: Message 246 by inkorrekt
02-18-2006 2:43 AM


Re: No creator, but science
The analogy between ID and Steve Jobs is simple and is obvious.
Indeed, it is quite obvious that there is no analogy there at all. That Steve Jobs might have invented the apple has no relation as to whether biological organisms are invented or have evolved. All of the evidence is that they have evolved.
The source of the first life form on earth is as yet unknown, but ToE does not deal with that issue. It deals only with accounting for the observed biological diversity.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 246 by inkorrekt, posted 02-18-2006 2:43 AM inkorrekt has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024