Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,890 Year: 4,147/9,624 Month: 1,018/974 Week: 345/286 Day: 1/65 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Big Bang is NOT Scientific
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 165 of 301 (299302)
03-29-2006 10:51 AM
Reply to: Message 164 by CCXC
03-29-2006 10:14 AM


Re: models and kalam
quote:
If something comes into being then it must have a cause, how is it rational to assume otherwise?
Since we have not witnessed every possible thing that has come into being or will come into being, how is it rational to assume that everything that comes into being must have a cause?

"Religion is the best business to be in. It's the only one where the customers blame themselves for product failure."
-- Ellis Weiner (quoted on the NAiG message board)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 164 by CCXC, posted 03-29-2006 10:14 AM CCXC has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 166 by CCXC, posted 03-29-2006 11:02 AM Chiroptera has replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 168 of 301 (299327)
03-29-2006 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 166 by CCXC
03-29-2006 11:02 AM


Re: models and kalam
quote:
But those things that will come into being will probably have a cause.
I don't think you really mean this. Probably is not certainly. By using the word "probably" you are acknowledging doubt, and so you are acknowledging the unsoundness of any argument that includes "everything that exists has a cause" as a premise.

"Religion is the best business to be in. It's the only one where the customers blame themselves for product failure."
-- Ellis Weiner (quoted on the NAiG message board)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by CCXC, posted 03-29-2006 11:02 AM CCXC has not replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 173 of 301 (299382)
03-29-2006 2:51 PM
Reply to: Message 172 by CCXC
03-29-2006 2:44 PM


Re: models and kalam
quote:
If the universe has a beginning then how did that beginning come to be?
Who knows? Maybe it just did.

"Religion is the best business to be in. It's the only one where the customers blame themselves for product failure."
-- Ellis Weiner (quoted on the NAiG message board)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 172 by CCXC, posted 03-29-2006 2:44 PM CCXC has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 174 by CCXC, posted 03-29-2006 3:27 PM Chiroptera has replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 175 of 301 (299389)
03-29-2006 3:34 PM
Reply to: Message 174 by CCXC
03-29-2006 3:27 PM


Re: models and kalam
quote:
how can everything come from nothing?
If the universe has no cause, then this question cannot be answered. "How can" implies a cause.
Let me ask a different question: why couldn't the universe have no cause?

"Religion is the best business to be in. It's the only one where the customers blame themselves for product failure."
-- Ellis Weiner (quoted on the NAiG message board)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 174 by CCXC, posted 03-29-2006 3:27 PM CCXC has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by CCXC, posted 03-29-2006 3:46 PM Chiroptera has replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 182 of 301 (299403)
03-29-2006 4:15 PM
Reply to: Message 177 by CCXC
03-29-2006 3:46 PM


Re: models and kalam
quote:
Because the universe can't come from nothing.
This doesn't answer the question. It is simply a restatement of your previous claim. You are simply stating that the universe must have a cause. I am asking you why you think this. Who knows -- if your reasoning is sufficiently sound you may even convince me that this must be the case. However, simply repeating that the universe must have a cause over and over again does not constitute reasoning.
-
quote:
Can you explain how this would be possible?
No, I cannot. If the universe has no cause, then there would be no answer to this question. If the universe has no cause, then it simply exists. If the universe has no cause, then there simply is no process that explains how it came to exist.
-
quote:
Can any scientific theory how the whole universe could come from nothing?
Perhaps it could. But then it would be explaining the cause of the universe. If the universe has no cause, then there would be no way to explain how it came to be since it would simply exist.

"Religion is the best business to be in. It's the only one where the customers blame themselves for product failure."
-- Ellis Weiner (quoted on the NAiG message board)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 177 by CCXC, posted 03-29-2006 3:46 PM CCXC has not replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 238 of 301 (300806)
04-04-2006 8:37 AM
Reply to: Message 236 by Son Goku
04-04-2006 8:25 AM


Re: Problems
quote:
I'm saying the universe is a 4 manifold, with distance and time as just another field in it.
That's interesting. If a successful theory of quantum gravity results in a paradigm shift where another field of mathematics turns out to be more useful, will the fundamental nature of the universe change as well?

"Religion is the best business to be in. It's the only one where the customers blame themselves for product failure."
-- Ellis Weiner (quoted on the NAiG message board)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 236 by Son Goku, posted 04-04-2006 8:25 AM Son Goku has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 242 by Son Goku, posted 04-04-2006 9:48 AM Chiroptera has replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 241 of 301 (300819)
04-04-2006 9:31 AM
Reply to: Message 235 by cavediver
04-04-2006 4:57 AM


Re: Stirring It Up
quote:
The maths is a pain primarily becasue of the typesetting. Anyone know of an easy way of getting equations written down here?
I would be interested in this, too. If the conversation was going to be solely between mathematics people, the LaTeX would be good enough -- I'm assuming that most people can read raw, untypeset LaTeX (I originally learned it mainly to write email, in fact). However, as Modulous points out, it seems to be problematic getting it into HTML, and untypeset equations would definitely leave out a lot of people.

"Religion is the best business to be in. It's the only one where the customers blame themselves for product failure."
-- Ellis Weiner (quoted on the NAiG message board)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 235 by cavediver, posted 04-04-2006 4:57 AM cavediver has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 256 by bob_gray, posted 04-04-2006 11:41 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 243 of 301 (300831)
04-04-2006 10:05 AM
Reply to: Message 242 by Son Goku
04-04-2006 9:48 AM


Re: Problems
quote:
Well time and distance is just another field and that is unlikely to change
If you mean that time and distance are very well modelled as fields and this probably will not change, then I will agree with you. Whether time and space are fields I'm not so sure about -- perhaps Kant is correct and time and space do not even exist except as mental constructions to organize the perceptions that we experience.
-
quote:
Whether the base space is actually a 4-manifold or not I don't know, but we at least know it is excellently approximated by one which is why I used it.
That is what I was trying to say.

"Religion is the best business to be in. It's the only one where the customers blame themselves for product failure."
-- Ellis Weiner (quoted on the NAiG message board)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by Son Goku, posted 04-04-2006 9:48 AM Son Goku has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 244 by Son Goku, posted 04-04-2006 10:34 AM Chiroptera has not replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 255 of 301 (300999)
04-04-2006 8:59 PM
Reply to: Message 239 by Modulous
04-04-2006 8:54 AM


Re: Stirring It Up
Interesting. The "typeset" equations are still gibberish on my home computer (Mac OSX, Firefox), but different gibberish than on my office computer (LINUX, Firefox).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 239 by Modulous, posted 04-04-2006 8:54 AM Modulous has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 260 by Codegate, posted 04-05-2006 1:35 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 268 of 301 (301876)
04-07-2006 8:11 AM
Reply to: Message 267 by cavediver
04-07-2006 3:37 AM


off-topic for a moment -- sorry
quote:
I would stick to the recommended books...
Is Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler a recommended text (for someone who is at the appropriate level, of course) or is it out-dated now? What do you recommend?

"Religion is the best business to be in. It's the only one where the customers blame themselves for product failure."
-- Ellis Weiner (quoted on the NAiG message board)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 267 by cavediver, posted 04-07-2006 3:37 AM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 269 by cavediver, posted 04-07-2006 8:38 AM Chiroptera has replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 271 of 301 (301896)
04-07-2006 9:10 AM
Reply to: Message 269 by cavediver
04-07-2006 8:38 AM


Re: off-topic for a moment -- sorry
Thanks, cavediver. Maybe late I'll pick your brains for a good cosmology text. Maybe quantum field theory, too, if that is up your alley. No need to give any recommendations now, though, since they might be out-dated by the time I get to them.
quote:
warning for anyone else reading this... these are graduate texts and not layman books!
Heh. No bowling balls sitting on rubber sheets, eh?

"Religion is the best business to be in. It's the only one where the customers blame themselves for product failure."
-- Ellis Weiner (quoted on the NAiG message board)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 269 by cavediver, posted 04-07-2006 8:38 AM cavediver has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 272 by Son Goku, posted 04-07-2006 11:23 AM Chiroptera has not replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 294 of 301 (302537)
04-08-2006 8:23 PM
Reply to: Message 293 by Buzsaw
04-08-2006 8:17 PM


Re: Time To Watch
quote:
...the science credibility of the BB really hangs on....
The credibility to whom?

"Religion is the best business to be in. It's the only one where the customers blame themselves for product failure."
-- Ellis Weiner (quoted on the NAiG message board)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 293 by Buzsaw, posted 04-08-2006 8:17 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 295 by Buzsaw, posted 04-08-2006 8:48 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024