You have been shown many, many times that there is a ton of evidence against the flood and almost none for it.
You are too kind. I asked Faith why the flood, Faith replied, reply was unsatisfactory in the least IMHO.
Outside of a too literal interpretation of the Bible, I don't see how there is any evidence for a flood. I believe the term "almost none for it" would be better stated "absolutely none for it outside of Biblical literalism."
Just my personal opinion (based upon ovewhelming evidence).