Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Top ten works in the Theory of Evolution
ramoss
Member (Idle past 643 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 17 of 34 (336721)
07-30-2006 6:41 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by randman
07-30-2006 6:10 PM


Re: Randman is right!
Except that we don't "get the results" since the facts keep piling up against the predictions of ToE. Furthermore, you are wrong to think a false system cannot work. The Egyptians had a system that worked perfectly well. Every year, this god or that god went through something, brining on spring, the rains, etc,....and by your logic, they had to be right because if there explanations were wrong, they would have no predictive power.
That is a fine asserstion. Care to back it up with what those facts are? What are the predictions of TOE that are falsified, and what are the facts that falsify those predictions? Do you have a peer reviewed scientific article about it, or are you taking it from a 'creationist' web site?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by randman, posted 07-30-2006 6:10 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by randman, posted 07-31-2006 2:19 AM ramoss has replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 643 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 28 of 34 (336885)
07-31-2006 10:32 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by randman
07-31-2006 2:19 AM


Re: Randman is right!
And now is that?? Repeating an assersion doesn't make it any more true.
Give examples. Just repeating a phrase 'Its wrong' is meaningless. You make a claim. Show evidence of this.
Claiming somethign without any evidence is just showing a level of ignorance about the subject. In what way does the fossil record disprove evolutions predictions? Are you sure it isn't you that is mistaken, and not the biologists and palentologists?
Edited by AdminModulous, : No reason given.
Edited by AdminModulous, : 'evolution is wrong' drivebys are common place, and have a tendency to throw topics off. We're just talking about landmark evolution papers here - let's keep things tight.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by randman, posted 07-31-2006 2:19 AM randman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024