quote:
I was NOT trying to argue that the words of the Bible are not fact.
That comment was not directed at you.
quote:
If you still feel this is offtopic I will drop it, but I thought I was dealing specifically with assumed fact based on faith, vs assessing factual statements based on other sources as we do in other fields.
You're actually dealing with the approach that assumes fact based on faith.
Reread the OP and keep your arguments in line with that.
Therefore any person of faith is logically unable to objectively analyse any theory or evidence that directly opposes their faith based position.
Can a person of faith objectively analyze any theory or evidence that directly opposes their faith based position? The originator says no based on his conclusion:
If someone has faith then they have 100% certainty
If they have 100% certanty in something then anything that opposes that must logically be false no matter what the evidence to the contrary.
Please direct any comments concerning this Admin msg to the Moderation Thread.
Any responses in this thread will receive a 24 hour Timout.
Thank you --AdminPD