Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Faith Science - Logically Indefensible
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 79 of 166 (354050)
10-03-2006 11:50 PM
Reply to: Message 76 by iceage
10-03-2006 10:59 PM


Re: Religion and Science incompatible
The difference between science and faith based religion is that science will abandon a position if a new theory does a better job than the previous.
Science would not abandon a position based on a known fact.
There is lots and lots of room for creative thinking about HOW the Flood happened, how evolutionist explanations are wrong, how the geo column was formed, how genetics works really, etc etc. etc.
Enemies of biblical Christianity assert that the biblical account borrowed from the Gilgamesh epic. Followers of Christ cannot agree. So in line with the Apostle Paul’s teaching in 2 Corinthians 10:5, it’s important to demolish this liberal theory.
Their reading (twisted interpretation?) of the word clearly shows that objective evidence takes a second seat to accepted prevailing beliefs. A good example of how faith and science are incompatible.
Paul's statements ARE objective fact. The Biblical accounts ARE objective statements of fact. This is what you don't get. You guys just compartmentalize your facts and judge from sheer prejudice.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by iceage, posted 10-03-2006 10:59 PM iceage has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by jar, posted 10-04-2006 12:01 AM Faith has replied
 Message 90 by iceage, posted 10-04-2006 2:26 AM Faith has not replied
 Message 91 by PaulK, posted 10-04-2006 2:29 AM Faith has not replied
 Message 96 by Percy, posted 10-04-2006 9:00 AM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 81 of 166 (354054)
10-04-2006 12:10 AM
Reply to: Message 80 by jar
10-04-2006 12:01 AM


Re: Religion and Science incompatible
I said a KNOWN fact, jar. I MEANT a KNOWN fact. I meant an absolutely incontrovertible fact. And my statement is true.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by jar, posted 10-04-2006 12:01 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by jar, posted 10-04-2006 12:14 AM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 104 of 166 (354191)
10-04-2006 2:05 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by purpledawn
10-04-2006 6:47 AM


A scientist starts with some sort of premise or idea to prove or disprove.
A creationist starts with a premise from the Bible. I think they can objectively view the evidence, but will reject that which contradicts the foundation of their faith...
Yes. and yes to much of the rest of your argument here too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by purpledawn, posted 10-04-2006 6:47 AM purpledawn has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by kuresu, posted 10-04-2006 2:15 PM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 107 of 166 (354196)
10-04-2006 2:18 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by nwr
10-04-2006 12:22 AM


Re: Religion and Science incompatible
On earth, what goes up must come down -- within the atmospheric range of course.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by nwr, posted 10-04-2006 12:22 AM nwr has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024