I think she did quite a sufficient job regardless of the responses to her which were, again, not empirical refutes.
Faith's posts consisted of the fingers-in-her-ears-head-in-the-sand willfull ignorance so typical of religious fundamentalists. Such gems like:
I just don't accept radiocarbon dating
but no way to know that I can see since radiocarbon dating is as good as wild guessing.
This one is great, she admits she's being willfully ignorant:
I don't accept carbon dating, never have. It proves nothing. I have said, however, that I don't understand it well enough to discuss it and will concede the point when the discussion gets technical.
the responses to her which were, again, not empirical refutes
Why would people need to empirically refute
her posts? It was her job to refute the evidence given to her with something more substantial than "radiocarbon dating is wrong cause I say so".
Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.
Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.
Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor