Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,897 Year: 4,154/9,624 Month: 1,025/974 Week: 352/286 Day: 8/65 Hour: 2/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

Discussion of John MacKay's Views

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Discussion of John MacKay's Views
Taz
Member (Idle past 3320 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 74 of 77 (406429)
06-19-2007 11:33 PM 		Reply to: Message 62 by subbie
06-19-2007 4:36 PM

Re: Showmanship
subbie writes:
​
Here's one online (via email) debate between Phillip Johnson and Philip Kitcher. I shall leave it to the reader to determine who won.
I find that debate completely useless in this issue. Why? Because if you're already on the side of science you will think Kitcher won and if you're already on the side of religion you will agree that Johnson won. Why? Because neither guy presented anything new, neither actually pointed out any specific, and neither had any clear advantage over the other.
​
Disclaimer:
​
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
​
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes![/size]
This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by subbie, posted 06-19-2007 4:36 PM subbie has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-19-2007 11:39 PM Taz has replied
  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3320 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 77 of 77 (406496)
06-20-2007 4:06 PM 		Reply to: Message 75 by Dr Adequate
06-19-2007 11:39 PM

Re: That Was Odd, Yes ...
edited... look at adminmoose's message
​
Edited by Tazmanian Devil, : No reason given.
​
Disclaimer:
​
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
​
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes![/size]
This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-19-2007 11:39 PM Dr Adequate has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024