What I'm talking about is this supposed evolutionary process of the eye is most likely the exact same process the eye takes when forming in the womb,...
Ah yes,
ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny ...
Haeckel would be so proud ...
Seems more like (
fill in your favorite) that don't know much about evolution recapitulate all those discarded concepts that have already been invalidated?
Welcome to the fray godservant.
... which in reality is not any proof that it ever evolved over millions or billions of years through chance production.
A good place to (start) learn(ing) about evolution is
berkeley's website.
Meanwhile consider this:
(1) no two organisms are identical
(2) any organism that is more capable of survival and breeding than another organism will more often than not survive and breed more than the other
(3) because of (1), (2) inevitably happens.
It's a natural process that takes place every time an egg is fertilized.
Actually most fertilized eggs fail to reach maturity.
Nothing remotely new or dramatic.
And what would qualify as "new" or "dramatic" for you? Have you really thought about this?
Enjoy.
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.
• • • Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click) • • •