Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Probability of the existence of God
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 89 of 219 (464804)
04-29-2008 1:25 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by ICANT
04-29-2008 1:00 PM


Re: It can't be 100%
Catholic Scientist writes:
but it can never be 100%.
When the experiment is over and each one of us stand before God the Son to be judged and we receive our just rewards for what we have done in the flesh there will be no doubt left in anyone's mind, as to the existence of God.
Such pedantry!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by ICANT, posted 04-29-2008 1:00 PM ICANT has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 92 of 219 (464813)
04-29-2008 2:32 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by iano
04-29-2008 1:32 PM


Re: The problem is a lack of faith!
Secondly, Jesus uses the word 'not seen' in the context someone believing through physical seeing. We have no basis for supposing he meant 'without evidence' instead of 'not seen' when the context indicates not having physically seen.
But Thomas stuck his finger in Jesus' side....
I don't think Jesus was referring to sight and sight alone when he refers to 'not seeing'.
Even in modern usage of the word we might say that someone "saw for themself" when referring to some other sense that they used.
Jesus doesn't say anything about how those who don't see yet believe come to believe so you cannot dismiss their coming to belief via unseen evidence out of hand. Certainly not in the light of Hebrews 11:1 which tells us that faith is evidence of things unseen. Evidence of Christ unseen? Why not?
To me, it just doesn't seem to be what Jesus is saying.
I believe that those who don't see yet believe come to believe by faith. Their faith is what allows them to believe in the absense of evidence, but the faith, itself, is not the evidence. It can't be the evidence because then we have the circular definition.
Faith = the cause. Belief = the effect..in this context.
I understand the definition, I just don't subscribe to it because that isn't how it works for me personally.
Also, if faith is the god supplied cause, and some people are without faith (not by choice) then god has let them down.
That is not to say that the word faith is not interchangeable with belief in another context. It's like the word death. Death is used in one context to mean spiritual separation from God. In another context it's used to mean physical dying. Sleep is used in one context to mean Zzzz. In another it refers to Christians who have died.
I just don't see faith as being that way. It isn't for me, at least.
Faith isn't some stuff that provides me with the reason to believe. I believe without reason because I have faith. I don't need a reason if I have faith. But my faith is not my evidence for believing, its a lack of evidence.
I'm not saying God picks and chooses which people believe in him and which don't. I'm just saying that the reason people believe anything is because of their having evidence for it.
And that counters what I understand Jesus' teaching to be about having faith in the absense of evidence as being blessed.
That God provides evidence to the one and not ther other need not be because of Gods picking and choosing. I would hold that man has a part to play in his own eternal destination.
But man cannot control what he finds convincing and what he doesn't. I can't just choose to believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by iano, posted 04-29-2008 1:32 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by iano, posted 04-29-2008 4:53 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 93 of 219 (464815)
04-29-2008 2:37 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by ICANT
04-29-2008 1:59 PM


Re: The problem is a lack of faith!
Hi Cs,
Message 85
Catholic Scientist writes:
No, Thomas got his faith when he saw that it really was Jesus and when he touched him.
Where does the scripture you quoted say that Thomas touched Jesus.
John 20:
quote:
27Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing.
Seems to me you are just reading that into the passage.
Message 89
Catholic Scientist writes:
Such pedantry!
Thanks.
Seems you don't know what pedantry is.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by ICANT, posted 04-29-2008 1:59 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by ICANT, posted 04-29-2008 3:06 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 95 of 219 (464821)
04-29-2008 3:15 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by ICANT
04-29-2008 3:06 PM


Re: The problem is a lack of faith!
Catholic Scientist writes:
ICANT writes:
Where does the scripture you quoted say that Thomas touched Jesus.
John 20:
quote:
27Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing.
Could you point out the specific words that says Thomas reached out and touched Jesus.
Ugh....
John 20:
quote:
27Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing.
Oh but it doesn't say that he actually did it
You, yourself, on this forum, have added a lot more to less with that crap about Gen 2 being in between Gen 1:1 and Gen 1:2, or whatever it was, so don't give me this crap about what the Bible actually says.
Maybe I don't but if it {pedantry} hasn't changed it has to do with presentation or application of knowledge or learning.
From wiki
quote:
A pedant, or pædant, is a person who is overly concerned with formalism and precision, or who makes a show of learning.
The term is typically used with a negative connotation, indicating someone overly concerned with minutiae and detail and whose tone is perceived as condescending.
However some people take pride in being a pedant, especially with regard to the use of the English language
Or the use of the Bible....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by ICANT, posted 04-29-2008 3:06 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by ICANT, posted 04-29-2008 4:01 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 98 of 219 (464827)
04-29-2008 4:21 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by ICANT
04-29-2008 4:01 PM


Re: The problem is a lack of faith!
But if I study the Word of God and let it interpet itself being precise in what it says allowing the Holy Spirit to lead and guide me in all truth I can find the truth.
Like the truth that Thomas didn't touch Jesus?
That is why I can be 100% sure I will see God the moment my spirit leaves this earthly body.
But you could be wrong....
And how do you know that it isn't Satan disguised as the Holy Spirit giving you false interpretations to lead you astray?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by ICANT, posted 04-29-2008 4:01 PM ICANT has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 101 of 219 (464832)
04-29-2008 5:36 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by iano
04-29-2008 4:53 PM


Re: The problem is a lack of faith!
Which only goes to underline my point.
Whoops, I misunderstood that point but its clear now.
I understand the definition, I just don't subscribe to it because that isn't how it works for me personally.
...is your perogative. The biblical case is fairly straighforward however
Yes, yes whatever. Lets just discuss from a Biblical standpoint, ok?
I’m reposting the passages in question for clarity .
Hebrews 11:
quote:
1Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
From John 20:
quote:
27Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing.
28And Thomas answered and said unto him, My LORD and my God.
29Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.
The way Jesus talks of faith doesn't seem to fit with the Hebrews definition...
How did Thomas get faith by seeing Jesus if faith is the evidence for things that are not seen?
Thomas’s evidence for his belief is not his faith, he only gets his faith after he gets the physical evidence, and the physical evidence is what allowed him to believe.
Jesus says that those who are blessed {as opposed to the blessed } are the ones that believe without seeing (ie evidence). If you are going to equate faith with evidence, then you are believing by seeing... Jesus doesn't explicitly say that you are unblessed, but the implication is there.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by iano, posted 04-29-2008 4:53 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by iano, posted 04-30-2008 6:37 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 105 by ICANT, posted 04-30-2008 11:42 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 102 of 219 (464833)
04-29-2008 5:40 PM
Reply to: Message 100 by iano
04-29-2008 5:34 PM


Re: The problem is a lack of faith!
As pointed out, the word faith is like the word death.. is like the word sleep. In this instance Jesus uses faith and belief interchangably. "Be not faithless but be believing" means "be not un unbelieving but have faith".
Then the same could be said about the definition provided by Hebrews....
Faith itself isn't a substance, they were talking about believing
As pointed out, this presupposes your being justified in altering the words that Jesus spoke.
To me, it seems like you are the one doing the altering

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by iano, posted 04-29-2008 5:34 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by iano, posted 04-30-2008 7:58 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024