Okay, I take it then that the 'evolutionist' can suggest by inference that inert molecules can and will gradually organize and assemble themselves on their own volition onto much more fragile and complex designs, then onto life itself. And for this claim they will offer no credible evidence themselves, but only insist that they have seen no 'scientific evidence otherwise'.
IMO, there is a lot of that here from the evolutionist side, that is huge reaches of logic and conclusions with little hard fact to support it, and calling that out is not 'busting on them' or anything else. Give the 'coyotes' a pass on that if you will and warn me, its your forum. That however does equal a strong defense of their posture.
What is considered 'scientific evidence' is a very broad area and gets very theoretical, speculative and fuzzy around the edges and highly subject to interpretation. For those who engage science to such ends, science can no more prove or disprove a creator/designer, where/how life originated than they can suggest that inert molecules can and will gradually organize and assemble themselves of their own volition onto much more fragile and complex designs then onto life itself. All they can and will say is 'we are working on it'.
™ Version 4.2
