A Designer Consistent with the Physical Evidence

Do you know what is wrong with this argument? Do you realize why no one takes this claim seriously? Let me explain it to you.You are stating a hypothesis as fact, without providing any facts to substantiate it.I will give you an example:Premise A: "Objects fall toward the ground when there is nothing to suspend them"
Premise B: "We know Premise A to be true because we can see objects fall to the ground."
Premise C: "We know Premise A & B to be true because we have repeatedly tested them, with many other individuals independently testing them."
Conclusion: Objects fall toward the ground when there is nothing to suspend them.Your argument stops at Premise A. This is evident as not once do you use the words (or any combination thereof of similar meaning) "we know this because" with facts following them.I would posit the reason that you go no further than Premise A is due mainly to your lack of any substantiating evidence whatsoever for your claim.

It has become apparent that your intention here is not to discuss knowledge at all. It isn't to describe facts, and how they interact with your interpretation of reality. It isn't to establish some new theory that can be utilized in the advancement of human knowledge and understanding.No, it has become quite obvious that your intention here is to hammer the same unsubstantiated statement, over, and over, until everyone stops replying to you. At which point you will have the half empty reassurance that you were "right" and they were "wrong".Until you realize that your are not checking your "common knowledge" to actual knowledge, you will go no where. Remember, it is the one who provides evidence against "common knowledge", that is typically destroyed by the ones who possess the "common knowledge".Edited by Michamus, : Minor typo.

Thank you.

Alright, that's your Premise A... now what's the substantiating evidence? Alright, another Premise A... now what's the substantiating evidence? Alright another Premise A... now what's the substantiating evidence?