Son
Member (Idle past 3859 days) Posts: 346 From: France,Paris Joined: 03-11-2009
|
|
Message 20 of 76 (506686)
04-28-2009 11:12 AM
|
Reply to: Message 19 by SammyJean 04-28-2009 10:39 AM
|
|
Re: Chairty
Well, it's harder for atheists to take credit for things because the only thing atheists share is their non-belief in god(s). The athesits that participate in charities don't do it because they are atheists and i bet that for lots of them, atheism is not really that important. Most of them would take credit as a person, not as an atheist(or as a non-beliver in fairies). It seems more logical to make a secular organisation (like those that exists already).
This message is a reply to: | | Message 19 by SammyJean, posted 04-28-2009 10:39 AM | | SammyJean has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 21 by dwise1, posted 04-28-2009 2:33 PM | | Son has replied |
|
Son
Member (Idle past 3859 days) Posts: 346 From: France,Paris Joined: 03-11-2009
|
|
Message 24 of 76 (506716)
04-28-2009 3:00 PM
|
Reply to: Message 21 by dwise1 04-28-2009 2:33 PM
|
|
Re: Chairty
What i meant is that we already have non-religious charities. (Unicef and stuffs like that). It's just that when an atheist will create a charity, he will only reference what they do, not what they don't believe in because it wouldn't make sense to say:"atheist organisation for children", they would just say:"organisation for children". Whereas a religious one will usually reference his beliefs to gain converts.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 21 by dwise1, posted 04-28-2009 2:33 PM | | dwise1 has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 49 by Rrhain, posted 05-01-2009 1:51 PM | | Son has not replied |
|