quote:
you can only ignore this for so long before everyone reading realizes that you just don't have an answer for it. I for one plodded along in this thread hoping you would answer the question. Please do. I don't want to have to read another thread where you ignore the meat of everyone's posts to address non-issues.
You aren't telling the truth. I answered the question more than once but it is ignored. I not only explained it myself but I pointed the readers to the experts who developed the formula. Here is yet another:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/art.../age-of-the-universe-2
You aren't telling the truth.
I am telling the truth.
I answered the question more than once but it is ignored.
Then you aren't understanding what is being asked of you.
I not only explained it myself but I pointed the readers to the experts who developed the formula.
What you did was demonstrate why it is a constant in your equation. The question was why is k assumed to be constant? Like I said before, we understand how it works in your equation, but WHY is it assumed to be constant?
None of that explained why k is constant.
Either you are dodging on purpose, which is dishonest, or you are really just not getting what is being asked of you.
If you can't explain why k is constant, outside of your equation, please do not bother responding.