Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 0/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Moons: their origin, age, & recession
Dman
Member (Idle past 5046 days)
Posts: 38
Joined: 02-26-2009


(1)
Message 126 of 222 (528629)
10-06-2009 2:56 PM
Reply to: Message 100 by Calypsis4
10-06-2009 1:58 PM


Re: Go ahead
YAY! More special pleading from Calypsis4!
But moving on, show us how this:
Evolved into this:
Give an observed example.
Unless you plan to do the exact same and show HOW this:
created this:
and give an observed example. Stop demanding it of your opponents. Do you believe this is an honest tactic to use?? Come on!
Do you even know when you use special pleading? Because it is a clear case in all of your topics so far.
Also it is probably a good idea to address the whole "why is k constant" issue. We know why it is constant for your equation. But why is k a constant in the first place? What observations verify k as a constant?
You can only ignore this for so long before everyone reading realizes that you just don't have an answer for it. I for one plodded along in this thread hoping you would answer the question. Please do. I don't want to have to read another thread where you ignore the meat of everyone's posts to address non-issues.
Edited by Dman, : No reason given.
Edited by Dman, : Clarity.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Calypsis4, posted 10-06-2009 1:58 PM Calypsis4 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 133 by Calypsis4, posted 10-06-2009 3:16 PM Dman has replied

Dman
Member (Idle past 5046 days)
Posts: 38
Joined: 02-26-2009


Message 153 of 222 (528669)
10-06-2009 4:08 PM
Reply to: Message 133 by Calypsis4
10-06-2009 3:16 PM


Re: Go ahead
quote:
you can only ignore this for so long before everyone reading realizes that you just don't have an answer for it. I for one plodded along in this thread hoping you would answer the question. Please do. I don't want to have to read another thread where you ignore the meat of everyone's posts to address non-issues.
You aren't telling the truth. I answered the question more than once but it is ignored. I not only explained it myself but I pointed the readers to the experts who developed the formula. Here is yet another:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/art.../age-of-the-universe-2
You aren't telling the truth.
I am telling the truth.
I answered the question more than once but it is ignored.
Then you aren't understanding what is being asked of you.
I not only explained it myself but I pointed the readers to the experts who developed the formula.
What you did was demonstrate why it is a constant in your equation. The question was why is k assumed to be constant? Like I said before, we understand how it works in your equation, but WHY is it assumed to be constant?
None of that explained why k is constant.
Either you are dodging on purpose, which is dishonest, or you are really just not getting what is being asked of you.
If you can't explain why k is constant, outside of your equation, please do not bother responding.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by Calypsis4, posted 10-06-2009 3:16 PM Calypsis4 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024