Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Moons: their origin, age, & recession
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9202
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.4


(1)
Message 86 of 222 (528573)
10-06-2009 1:10 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Calypsis4
10-06-2009 1:22 AM


Name please.
How about giving us the "Princeton astronomers" name.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Calypsis4, posted 10-06-2009 1:22 AM Calypsis4 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by Calypsis4, posted 10-06-2009 1:12 PM Theodoric has replied

Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9202
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.4


Message 154 of 222 (528670)
10-06-2009 4:10 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by Calypsis4
10-06-2009 1:10 PM


Is there a topic here?
Some evolutionists believe that the creation is the result of a random arrangement of atoms and molecules over billions of years. But when they consider the development of the human brain by random processes within a time span of less than a million years, they have to admit that this span is just not long enough. Or take the evolution of the eye in the animal world. What random process could possibly explain the simultaneous evolution of the eye’s optical system, the conductors of the optical signals from the eye to the brain, and the optical nerve center in the brain itself where the incoming light impulses are converted to an image the conscious mind can comprehend?
Our space ventures have been only the smallest of steps in the vast reaches of the universe and have introduced more mysteries than they have solved. Speaking for myself, I can only say that the grandeur of the cosmos serves to confirm my belief in the certainty of a Creator."
Can you please give me a clue as to what this has to do with the age of the moon.
Just a hint.
Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by Calypsis4, posted 10-06-2009 1:10 PM Calypsis4 has not replied

Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9202
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.4


Message 155 of 222 (528674)
10-06-2009 4:12 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by Calypsis4
10-06-2009 1:12 PM


Re: Name please.
So this was just a plagiarized story.
My name has nothing to do with the issue of your story. In order to give your story any credence at all the name of this supposed Princeton astronomer is very important.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by Calypsis4, posted 10-06-2009 1:12 PM Calypsis4 has not replied

Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9202
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.4


Message 156 of 222 (528676)
10-06-2009 4:20 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by Calypsis4
10-06-2009 11:48 AM


So the first two answers don't warrant a response? Because why? No creationist tract that deals with them?
Such answers are so pitifully shallow that it's hardly worth answering.
Oh wise one, please give us a "deep" answer.
You might want to include some real science.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Calypsis4, posted 10-06-2009 11:48 AM Calypsis4 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by Calypsis4, posted 10-06-2009 4:33 PM Theodoric has not replied

Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9202
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.4


(1)
Message 162 of 222 (528686)
10-06-2009 4:36 PM
Reply to: Message 123 by Calypsis4
10-06-2009 2:49 PM


Off topic are you serious
You have shown repeatedly that you ahve no qualms about going off topic when you feel it suits your interests(the funny thing it never suits your interests). But when someone follows up on one of you off-topic posts you claim the issue is off-topic. You are the most disingenuous debater we have had here in a long time.
Something you should learn and slevesque has tried to point out to you, volume of posts don't make you point any better. If anything they hurt you. The strength of your argument is incumbent on the quality of your posts. That you are being criticized by another creationist should tell you something. If it does not you have a huge issue with self-awareness.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by Calypsis4, posted 10-06-2009 2:49 PM Calypsis4 has not replied

Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9202
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.4


Message 166 of 222 (528694)
10-06-2009 4:52 PM
Reply to: Message 151 by Huntard
10-06-2009 3:58 PM


There is no Princeton Astromomer
I think we have shown without a shadow of a doubt that the whole OP is a sham. He is just a troll. He has no arguments and knows nothing about the subjects he has attempted to bring up. At least slevesque and some other creationists know something about the topics they bring up.
All this guy has is godidit and insults.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by Huntard, posted 10-06-2009 3:58 PM Huntard has not replied

Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9202
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.4


Message 171 of 222 (528706)
10-06-2009 5:20 PM
Reply to: Message 149 by Calypsis4
10-06-2009 3:53 PM


Astronomers name
Here is a list for the Princeton University department of astrophysics.
Do you want to tell us who this "astronomer" is or should I just email all of them asking for a comment. I am sure they would love to visit the forum and discuss your accusations that you completely baffled them.
# Neta A. Bahcall
# Adam Burrows
# Renyue Cen
# Christopher Chyba
# Bruce Draine
# Jeremy Goodman
# J. Richard Gott, III
# James E. Gunn
# Edward B. Jenkins
# Gillian R. Knapp
# Russell M. Kulsrud
# Robert Lupton
# Jeremiah P. Ostriker
# Roman Rafikov
# David N. Spergel
# Anatoly Spitkovsky
# James M. Stone
# Michael A. Strauss
# Scott D. Tremaine
# Edwin L. Turner
Very nice of the university to give me their email addresses.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by Calypsis4, posted 10-06-2009 3:53 PM Calypsis4 has not replied

Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9202
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.4


(2)
Message 211 of 222 (528871)
10-07-2009 10:28 AM
Reply to: Message 209 by Calypsis4
10-07-2009 10:19 AM


Re: Moderator Request
So you are not willing to address any of the issues or give us the time in the video that the evidence you claim is presented? I am not surprised. This is classic fundie behaviour.
It amazes me that the mods allow you to not follow the forum rules, you make personal attacks and yet some of the best posters on this whole site are disciplined because you refuse to present ANY evidence whatsoever.
I guess we need to learn how to deal with a troll. We should just not feed you.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 209 by Calypsis4, posted 10-07-2009 10:19 AM Calypsis4 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024