Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why Ratings Are Not Objective.
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


(1)
Message 2 of 88 (535790)
11-18-2009 1:01 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Buzsaw
11-18-2009 12:08 AM


one use of ratings ...
Hi Buz,
I agree, as this has been my experience on other forums. You also see ratings done by people who don't engage in the debate so that they are not "at risk" of having their POV destroyed.
Personally, when I see ratings set up like this, and begging for such abuse, I figure that they are a good measure of how much I have annoyed people who like to be complacent in their views. If I get over 4 then I haven't annoyed enough people.
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


• • • Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click) • • •

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Buzsaw, posted 11-18-2009 12:08 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 7 of 88 (535826)
11-18-2009 7:32 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Huntard
11-18-2009 5:27 AM


Re: Another point
A 3 would give the impression that there's something to the contents, and a lower rating wouldn't do the quality of the post justice.
Maybe a grid? quality of writing and quality of content?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Huntard, posted 11-18-2009 5:27 AM Huntard has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


(1)
Message 72 of 88 (538252)
12-04-2009 9:28 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by lyx2no
12-04-2009 7:01 PM


Re: Readability
Yes so you know anyone with a grade 10 or higher should be able to comprehend what you say.
My 11 is:
You are making two conceptual errors here. The first is that you can make a calculation when you only know part of the possibilities and have no idea how large the set is. It's not a probability, it is just an opinion based on your world view of what you think the probability is: there is no calculation. This pseudo-probability argument is just the argument from incredulity dressed up.
Enjoy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by lyx2no, posted 12-04-2009 7:01 PM lyx2no has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by lyx2no, posted 12-04-2009 9:53 PM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


(1)
Message 74 of 88 (538258)
12-04-2009 10:00 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by lyx2no
12-04-2009 9:53 PM


Re: Readability
Ah. My readability was 47, still well below sunday comics (which I'm not sure is a bad thing). I've been told that I need to write on a simpler level with a grade 5 target - to make sure my points get across. This is difficult to do when I already consider my points to be pretty simple.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


• • • Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click) • • •

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by lyx2no, posted 12-04-2009 9:53 PM lyx2no has seen this message but not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


(1)
Message 75 of 88 (538274)
12-05-2009 4:43 AM
Reply to: Message 70 by Admin
12-04-2009 6:16 PM


Re: Possible New Rating System?
Viv Pope puts us all to shame. Cut-n-paste some stuff from him and some of the rest of us into this Readabilty Index Calculator. I bet you won't find anyone who beats him.
might be interesting to have a "readability meter" for posts ...
(as if you have nothing else to do)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Admin, posted 12-04-2009 6:16 PM Admin has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024