It might be interesting to see how people think which explanations are the ones that best convince them -- Huntard and Straggler and any other lurkers who had trouble with this issue.
Well I was convinced of the wrongness of my initial intuitive assertion pretty much straight away. Just looking at what others had written and thinking about it a bit convinced me of that on a rational level. I just didn't like it. It didn't
feel right. I pursued the matter to A) Try and explain why I thought intuition and fact were so at odds B) To find a way of reconciling the two in my own head.
I think I achieved both (to my own satisfaction anyway) by thinking of this in terms of an infinite series and asymptotes. As per
Message 79
Straggler thinking to himself out loud writes:
Even if we think of 0.999R as the infinitie series 9/10 + 9/100 + 9/1000 + 9/10000 + ...... as is the correct way to think of this then I think in our heads we intuitively do the conceptual equivalent of plotting y as the sum of the series and x as the number of terms in the series. In which case y never actually equals 1.
But as you say 0.999R isn't the sum of the series as such. It is the asymptotic value.
It all makes more sense to me expressed like that anyway.
All of which Mr Jack had been saying to me in so many words anyway. It was just this particular approach/phraseology that made the penny drop in my own intuitive head.