Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   0.99999~ = 1 ?
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 237 (543087)
01-15-2010 10:01 AM


another simply way
1/3 = 0.333~
2/3 = 0.666~
3/3 = 0.999~

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 237 (543146)
01-15-2010 5:19 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Shield
01-15-2010 5:07 PM


Re: The paradox
2C-I?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Shield, posted 01-15-2010 5:07 PM Shield has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Shield, posted 01-16-2010 9:16 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 151 of 237 (544348)
01-25-2010 3:04 PM


You won a math debate...
read aloud for the lulz

Replies to this message:
 Message 152 by cavediver, posted 01-25-2010 3:12 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 153 of 237 (544351)
01-25-2010 3:16 PM
Reply to: Message 152 by cavediver
01-25-2010 3:12 PM


it sounds like 'you wanna masturbate'
did you not read it out loud?
Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by cavediver, posted 01-25-2010 3:12 PM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 154 by cavediver, posted 01-25-2010 3:24 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 155 of 237 (544356)
01-25-2010 3:35 PM
Reply to: Message 154 by cavediver
01-25-2010 3:24 PM


ahhh, mass debating.
heh, yeah, I missed that >.<

This message is a reply to:
 Message 154 by cavediver, posted 01-25-2010 3:24 PM cavediver has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 156 by lyx2no, posted 01-25-2010 4:37 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 196 of 237 (544614)
01-27-2010 2:10 PM
Reply to: Message 195 by Jon
01-27-2010 1:05 PM


Please, correct me where I have erred.
OK.
an infinitely long string of 0.9999| represents what would be infinite divisibility
Right there.
It represents the asymptote, itself, not the approach to it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by Jon, posted 01-27-2010 1:05 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 197 by Jon, posted 01-27-2010 2:38 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 198 of 237 (544618)
01-27-2010 2:45 PM
Reply to: Message 197 by Jon
01-27-2010 2:38 PM


with the infinitely divided being the space between.
Huh?
0.9R is 1, there's no space between.
The point remains, do these concepts of Math have Real-world counterparts or are they merely conceptual?
There might be some math concepts that are merely conceptual, but I don't think 0.9R is one of them.
quote:
Wikipedia (emphases added):
The idea that a curve may come arbitrarily close to a line without actually becoming the same may seem counter to everyday experience. The representations of a line and a curve as marks on a piece of paper or as pixels on a computer screen have a positive width. So if the they were to be extended far enough they would seem to merge together, at least as far as the eye could discern. But these are physical representations of the corresponding mathematical entities; the line and the curve are idealized concepts whose width is 0 (see Line). Therefore the understanding the idea of an asymptote requires an effort of reason rather than experience.
A line that represents my path from here to there does have a width of zero, regardless of my inability to draw the line on a piece of paper that way.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 197 by Jon, posted 01-27-2010 2:38 PM Jon has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024