Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Elitism and Nazism
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 48 of 125 (54765)
09-10-2003 12:25 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by Syamsu
09-10-2003 11:06 AM


Hi, Syamsu!
Though you were restricted to the Free For All forum, I see you've been posting to the Evolution forum recently. If you will agree to abide by administrator and moderator requests, even when they seem unreasonable to you, and to the letter and spirit of the Forum Guidelines, then I will lift the restriction.
------------------
--Percy
EvC Forum Administrator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Syamsu, posted 09-10-2003 11:06 AM Syamsu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by Syamsu, posted 09-10-2003 12:44 PM Admin has replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 53 of 125 (54781)
09-10-2003 2:16 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by Syamsu
09-10-2003 12:44 PM


Hi, Syamsu,
Well I just now violated your directive not to discuss comparitive selection vs my individual selection outside the free for all forum. I guess you should impose that restriction on others as well, otherwise it's not fair.
It is this attitude toward administrators and moderators that originally caused me to request that you restrict your participation here to the Free For All forum. The administrators and moderators have limited time to address issues that arise, and while there is certainly a willingness to explain our actions, there is insufficnet time to engage in the kind of extended explaining, explaining and re-explaining that accompanies most discussions with you.
For this reason this is my last post to you on the matter. I asked if you agree to abide by moderator and administrator requests, even when they don't seem reasonable to you, and to follow the Forum Guidelines. If you agree then I lift the restriction. If you don't agree then I ask that you restrict your participation to the Free For All forum. And if you reply in some other way then I will suspend your posting privileges.
------------------
--Percy
EvC Forum Administrator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Syamsu, posted 09-10-2003 12:44 PM Syamsu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Syamsu, posted 09-11-2003 12:45 AM Admin has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 69 of 125 (54926)
09-11-2003 9:49 AM


Forum Guidelines Advisory
I'd like to request that comments be confined to the thread's topic and not its participants.
------------------
--Percy
EvC Forum Administrator

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 80 of 125 (55089)
09-12-2003 8:58 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by The General
09-03-2003 1:49 AM


Hi, General!
After discovering that you were not the author of many of the words in your opening message in the Chemical Evolution thread, I decided to take a more careful look at this thread. Though I could not find on the Internet the original author of the opening post of this thread, after reviewing your other messages I am now convinced that they were not written by the same person, and that you did not write the opening message.
The Forum Guidelines state:
  1. Never include material not your own without attribution to the original source.
Persistent violations of the Forum Guidelines can result in a suspension of posting privileges.
------------------
--Percy
EvC Forum Administrator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by The General, posted 09-03-2003 1:49 AM The General has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by The General, posted 09-16-2003 1:27 AM Admin has replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 89 of 125 (55752)
09-16-2003 11:32 AM
Reply to: Message 84 by The General
09-16-2003 1:27 AM


Re: Countering A Display of Buffoonery
The General writes:
If you have a problem with its content it should be brought to my attention under 'Chemical Evolution.'
I did. See Message 4 of the Chemical Evolution thread.
Second, who are you to say what I have written and what I have not written.
I am merely someone who has done the following:
  1. Compared your words in the opening post of the Chemical Evolution thread with the words of Lee Stobel in his book The Case For Faith as quoted at http://student.fortlewis.edu/~ramosher/strobel.htm.
  2. Compared the style and vocabulary of the words in your replies to the words in your essays.
These comparisons tell me you are a plagiarist, which isn't permitted here as it is a violation of the Forum Guidelines:
  1. Never include material not your own without attribution to the original source.
The General writes:
This is my piece (Chemical Evolution), and while it does bear some terminology similarities to 'A Case for Faith' certainly it does not plagarize as you first suggested.
Your plagiarism of the Lee Stobel material is quite blatant and obvious:
  • Stobel (quoting Walter L. Bradley): "Russian biochemist Alexander Oparin proposed in 1924 that complex molecular arrangements and the functions of living matter evolved from simpler molecules that preexisted on the early earth," he said.
  • The General: It was Alexander Oparin who, in 1924, proposed that complex molecular arrangements and the functions of living matter evolved from simple molecules that pre-existed on the early earth.
  • Stobel: "Then in 1928, British biologist J.B.S. Haldane theorized that ultraviolet light acting on the earth's primitive atmosphere caused sugars and amino acids to concentrate in the oceans, and then life eventually emerged from this primordial broth."
  • The General: Then in 1928, J.B.S Haldane theorized that ultra-violet light acting in the earth's primitive atmosphere caused sugar and amino acids to concentrate in the oceans, and from there a primordial broth was eventually formed.
  • Stobel: Later Nobel Prize winner Horold Urey suggested that earth's primitive atmosphere would have made it favorable for organic compounds to have emerged.
  • The General: Nobel winner Harold Urey suggested that the earth's primitive atmosphere made it favorable for organic compounds to have emerged.
  • Stobel: I remember being taught in school about his landmark experiment in which he recreated the atmosphere of the primitive earth in a laboratory and shot electricity through it to simulate the effects of lightning.
  • The General: Miller recreated the atmosphere of the primitive earth in a laboratory and shot electricity through it to stimulate the effects of lightning.
  • Stobel: Before long, he found that amino acids--the building blocks of life--had been created.
  • The General: Very soon, he found that amino acids (the building blocks of life) had been created.
  • Stobel: I can remember my biology teacher recounting the experiment with an infectious enthusiasm, suggesting it proved conclusively that life could have emerged from nonliving chemicals.
  • The General: To many these proved that life could have emerged from non-living chemicals.
  • Stobel: "For a while, evolutionists were euphoric. But there was a major problem with the experiment that has invalidated its results." (Bradley speaking)
  • The General: Unfortunately for Miller, his results have since been invalidated due to one huge problem.
  • Stobel: "Miller and Oparin didn't have any real proof that the earth's early atmosphere was composed of ammonia, methane, and hydrogen, which Miller used in his experiment."
  • The General: The problem is Miller or Oparin had no proof that the earth's early atmosphere was composed of ammonia, methane, and hydrogen, yet this is what Miller used in his experiment.
  • Stobel: "They based their theory on physical chemistry."
  • The General: This experiment was based on physical chemistry.
  • Stobel: "They wanted to get a chemical reaction that would be favorable, and so they proposed that the atmosphere was rich in those gases."
  • The General: Miller and Oparin wanted to get a chemical reaction that would be favorable so they proposed that the atmosphere be rich in these gases.
  • Stobel: "Oparin was smart enough to know that if you start with inert gases like nitrogen and carbon dioxide, they won't react."
  • The General: Oparin knew that if you started with gases like nitrogen and carbon dioxide, the chemicals would not react.
  • Stobel: "What was the real environment of the early earth like?" I asked.
  • The General: So what was the real atmosphere like?
  • Stobel: "From 1980 on, NASA scientists have shown that the primitive earth never had any methane, ammonia, or hydrogen to amount to anything," he said.
  • The General: From 1980 on, which was well after the Miller experiment, NASA has shown that the primitive earth has NEVER had any methane, hydrogen, or ammonia that would amount to anything.
  • Stobel: "Instead, it was composed of water, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen--and you absolutely cannot get the same experimental results with that mixture."
  • The General: Instead, NASA has consistently shown that the primitive earth was composed of water, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen.
So, what do you think, General? Is Lee Stobel so simpatico with you that he can write your words in a book before you've even thought of them yourself? Or did you plagiarize Lee Stobel's words, either from his book or, more likely, from one of the many websites already using Stobel's material?
The General writes:
The reason you cannot find the original author on the Internet is because I have not put it on the Internet. However last year I did send out a nine part series to about fifty readers. Part I was titled "Different Theories on Man's Origins." Chemical Evolution was an excert from it. I could post the article on here, or I could email it to you. Or I could do neither. The choice is yours. Until then please keep your suspicions to yourself.
They're not suspicions. I've conclusively proved you are a plagiarist. Because of this, I think it would be a good idea for you to email any future essays to Admin and get my okay before opening any more new threads. There will be no penalties at this time, and you retain full privileges at EvC Forum.
------------------
--Percy
EvC Forum Administrator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by The General, posted 09-16-2003 1:27 AM The General has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024