PaulK
Member Posts: 17828 Joined: 01-10-2003 Member Rating: 2.5
|
|
Message 86 of 377 (607946)
03-08-2011 2:07 AM
|
Reply to: Message 85 by NoNukes
03-07-2011 9:03 PM
|
|
Re: Defining design.
I think that it is better to say that Dembski defined design for the purposes of his argument/ i.e. the definition is not intended for general use, only to make explicit what it means within the structure of the argument.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 85 by NoNukes, posted 03-07-2011 9:03 PM | | NoNukes has seen this message but not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2