Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Movie Paranormal Activity
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 61 of 285 (612785)
04-18-2011 5:33 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by Straggler
04-18-2011 5:22 PM


Re: Stories As Evidence But Actuality Disqualified
Straggler writes:
jar writes:
Perhaps after I die I will know.
Perhaps when you dream you know? What is the difference as far as you are concerned
jar writes:
That is also totally irrelevant to the issue of your fictional Armageddon. I answered that. If it happens then I will either be able to place it into the Known folder, or if I cannot understand it, the Unknown folder. I see no need of a Supernatural folder.
How does experiencing what could be called an "afterlife" change that for you?
jar writes:
And the distinctions between god, God and GODS is definitional; asking for evidential reasoning is just silly.
There is overwhelming evidence that humans are deeply able and deeply prone to inventing gods for various purposes. Explanation, comfort, companionship, meaning etc. etc. All of which suggests that such beliefs will exist regardless of any gods actually existing.
This same evidence applies to god, God, GOD. Your distinction is a false one isn't it? If not why not?
Already answered.
Ask me after I've died and I may be able to explain it.
And I am uninterested in what could be called an afterlife.
Learn to read what I write.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Straggler, posted 04-18-2011 5:22 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by Straggler, posted 04-19-2011 5:47 AM jar has replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 95 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 62 of 285 (612822)
04-19-2011 5:47 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by jar
04-18-2011 5:33 PM


Re: Stories As Evidence But Actuality Disqualified
jar writes:
Straggler writes:
There is overwhelming evidence that humans are deeply able and deeply prone to inventing gods for various purposes. Explanation, comfort, companionship, meaning etc. etc. All of which suggests that such beliefs will exist regardless of any gods actually existing.
This same evidence applies to god, God, GOD. Your distinction is a false one isn't it? If not why not?
Already answered.
Where?
jar writes:
And the distinctions between god, God and GODS is definitional; asking for evidential reasoning is just silly.
So what are these definitional differences?
jar writes:
And I am uninterested in what could be called an afterlife.
OK. So what are you talking about when you say "after I've died"....?
jar writes:
After I die I might find out that GOD is real though.
Is GOD supernatural?
jar writes:
If it happens then I will either be able to place it into the Known folder, or if I cannot understand it, the Unknown folder. I see no need of a Supernatural folder.
Except after apparently dying? Or still not even then?
jar writes:
Ask me after I've died and I may be able to explain it.
The actuality of biblical Armageddon occurs and you don't consider this to be evidence of the supernatural but you "wake-up" after apparently dying and it is perfectly possible for the supernatural to be evidenced. Is that right? If correct can you explain your reasoning? If incorrect can you explain where I have misunderstood?
jar writes:
Learn to read what I write.
I am genuinely trying to make sense of what you have written. But some clarification wouldn't go amiss here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by jar, posted 04-18-2011 5:33 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by jar, posted 04-19-2011 5:52 AM Straggler has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 63 of 285 (612823)
04-19-2011 5:52 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by Straggler
04-19-2011 5:47 AM


Re: Stories As Evidence But Actuality Disqualified
Please stop misrepresenting me, it is getting old.
I have never said "after apparently dying", I have said "after I am dead".
And yes, your Armageddon fantasy would not be evidence of the supernatural.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by Straggler, posted 04-19-2011 5:47 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by Straggler, posted 04-19-2011 6:48 AM jar has replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 95 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 64 of 285 (612831)
04-19-2011 6:48 AM
Reply to: Message 63 by jar
04-19-2011 5:52 AM


Re: Stories As Evidence But Actuality Disqualified
jar writes:
Please stop misrepresenting me, it is getting old.
If you clarified what you actually meant it might help here.
jar writes:
I have never said "after apparently dying", I have said "after I am dead".
If you retain consciousness after dying I am not sure how you could definitively distinguish between the two? But anyway.....I will assume that you somehow can for the sake of argument.
jar writes:
And yes, your Armageddon fantasy would not be evidence of the supernatural.
Because as you put it earlier - Jar: "it would remain in the Unknown Category until all the evidence, model and method was understood at which time it would almost certainly be found to be Natural".
But why wouldn't post death experiences also "remain in the Unknown Category until all the evidence, model and method was understood"....?
Why are your criteria and categories different in the two cases?
jar writes:
If it happens then I will either be able to place it into the Known folder, or if I cannot understand it, the Unknown folder. I see no need of a Supernatural folder.
Except after dying? Or still not even then?
jar writes:
After I die I might find out that GOD is real though.
Is GOD supernatural?
jar writes:
And the distinctions between god, God and GODS is definitional; asking for evidential reasoning is just silly.
So what are these definitional differences?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by jar, posted 04-19-2011 5:52 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by jar, posted 04-19-2011 6:55 AM Straggler has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 65 of 285 (612833)
04-19-2011 6:55 AM
Reply to: Message 64 by Straggler
04-19-2011 6:48 AM


Re: Stories As Evidence But Actuality Disqualified
Straggler writes:
So what are these definitional differences?
I will gladly repeat them for you.
A 'god' is the most detailed caricature held by a particular people in a given milieu as described in a particular story. An example would be the 'god' described in Genesis 2&3 or the 'god' described in Genesis 1. Two entirely different descriptions with almost nothing in common.
A 'God' is the next level of abstraction, for example the 'God' of the Old Testament or the 'God' of the New Testament, or the 'God' of Christianity or the 'God' of Islam.
GOD, if GOD exists though is the reality, the territory as opposed to a map, the critter as opposed to the caricature or portrait.
Edited by jar, : always find a teh in tehre appalin spallin

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by Straggler, posted 04-19-2011 6:48 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by Straggler, posted 04-19-2011 7:11 AM jar has replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 95 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 66 of 285 (612834)
04-19-2011 7:11 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by jar
04-19-2011 6:55 AM


Is GOD Supernatural?
jar writes:
GOD, if GOD exists though is the reality, the territory as opposed to a map, the critter as opposed to the caricature or portrait.
OK. But what makes belief that this GOD "critter" does exist different from believing that any 'God' exists? Is there a difference as far as you are concerned? If so what is it? What am I missing?
jar writes:
After I die I might find out that GOD is real though.
Is this GOD supernatural? Does GOD go in the "supernatural folder"?
jar writes:
If it happens then I will either be able to place it into the Known folder, or if I cannot understand it, the Unknown folder. I see no need of a Supernatural folder.
Except after dying? Or still not even then?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by jar, posted 04-19-2011 6:55 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by jar, posted 04-19-2011 7:23 AM Straggler has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 67 of 285 (612835)
04-19-2011 7:23 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by Straggler
04-19-2011 7:11 AM


Re: Is GOD Supernatural?
I don't know. Maybe after I am dead I will know.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by Straggler, posted 04-19-2011 7:11 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Straggler, posted 04-19-2011 1:59 PM jar has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18349
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 68 of 285 (612836)
04-19-2011 8:03 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by jar
04-10-2011 7:12 PM


Do we start by having no bias either way?
Crashfrog writes:
I'll ask it another way. You show someone a video of the supernatural, but it looks fake. What other evidence would be necessary to conclude the video isn't fake?
Several obvious questions spring to mind, here. First, the cameraman. If someone is filming the video, they would be actually experiencing an unexplainable event with their senses...rather than through a video, as the rest of us would do. My expectation is that the cameraman has a deeper perspective than mere watchers of the video would have.
TramLaw writes:
For me, before coming to a conclusion, I'd take it to an expert, or several, and get it analyzed first before coming to a conclusion. If they found any kind of glitches that could be an indication that it's a fake, then it's a fake. If they can't find anything that could be an indication of fakery, then it's not a fake. Or if there is no consensus then I'd simply call it inconclusive either way.
I agree with those who support the "unexplained" folder in lieu of a "supernatural" folder.
One has to at least know what one is putting into a folder.
jar writes:
evidence of the paranormal is by definition, impossible.
Sounds logical to me. an unexplained folder can be examined the same way that a so called "supernatural" category would be. The only difference is that preconceived bias is largely eliminated.
slavesque writes:
A paranormal (or supernatural) phenomenon is defined as a natural phenomenon that hasn't been identified as such yet.
Which is no different from "unexplained".
We could very well call it the Humpty Dumpty Folder, but the question that could be asked is this:
"Do you want to find anything in particular? Do you find yourself hoping for a certain conclusion?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by jar, posted 04-10-2011 7:12 PM jar has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by ringo, posted 04-19-2011 10:59 AM Phat has not replied
 Message 77 by slevesque, posted 04-19-2011 5:00 PM Phat has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 69 of 285 (612846)
04-19-2011 10:59 AM
Reply to: Message 68 by Phat
04-19-2011 8:03 AM


Re: Do we start by having no bias either way?
Phat writes:
Do you want to find anything in particular? Do you find yourself hoping for a certain conclusion?
That's the subtle difference between looking at evidence and looking for evidence.

If you have nothing to say, you could have done so much more concisely. -- Dr Adequate

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Phat, posted 04-19-2011 8:03 AM Phat has not replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 95 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 70 of 285 (612855)
04-19-2011 1:59 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by jar
04-19-2011 7:23 AM


Re: Is GOD Supernatural?
jar writes:
I don't know. Maybe after I am dead I will know.
What does being dead have to do with your ability to know enough to move things from the "unknown folder" to a "supernatural folder" as per your argument throughout this thread?
jar writes:
That is also totally irrelevant to the issue of your fictional Armageddon. I answered that. If it happens then I will either be able to place it into the Known folder, or if I cannot understand it, the Unknown folder. I see no need of a Supernatural folder.
If the end of times as invoked by the divine will of an omnipotent being fails to qualify as supernatural and necessarily goes in the "known" or "unknown" folder why does your post-death experience not also necessarily do the same?
Can you at least see why this seems like an inconsistent application of your folder criteria? Can you clear up this apparent inconsistency?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by jar, posted 04-19-2011 7:23 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by jar, posted 04-19-2011 2:45 PM Straggler has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 71 of 285 (612859)
04-19-2011 2:45 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by Straggler
04-19-2011 1:59 PM


Re: Is GOD Supernatural?
Straggler writes:
jar writes:
I don't know. Maybe after I am dead I will know.
What does being dead have to do with your ability to know enough to move things from the "unknown folder" to a "supernatural folder" as per your argument throughout this thread?
jar writes:
That is also totally irrelevant to the issue of your fictional Armageddon. I answered that. If it happens then I will either be able to place it into the Known folder, or if I cannot understand it, the Unknown folder. I see no need of a Supernatural folder.
If the end of times as invoked by the divine will of an omnipotent being fails to qualify as supernatural and necessarily goes in the "known" or "unknown" folder why does your post-death experience not also necessarily do the same?
Can you at least see why this seems like an inconsistent application of your folder criteria? Can you clear up this apparent inconsistency?
Maybe after I am dead. Shall I keep repeating the answer for you?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Straggler, posted 04-19-2011 1:59 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by Straggler, posted 04-19-2011 2:51 PM jar has replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 95 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 72 of 285 (612860)
04-19-2011 2:51 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by jar
04-19-2011 2:45 PM


Re: Is GOD Supernatural?
jar writes:
Shall I keep repeating the answer for you?
I'd prefer it if you answered the questions I am asking.
jar unhelpfully answers writes:
Maybe after I am dead.
What does being dead have to do with your ability to know enough to move things from the "unknown folder" to a "supernatural folder" as per your argument throughout this thread?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by jar, posted 04-19-2011 2:45 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by jar, posted 04-19-2011 3:01 PM Straggler has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 73 of 285 (612862)
04-19-2011 3:01 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by Straggler
04-19-2011 2:51 PM


Re: Is GOD Supernatural?
Straggler writes:
jar writes:
Shall I keep repeating the answer for you?
I'd prefer it if you answered the questions I am asking.
jar unhelpfully answers writes:
Maybe after I am dead.
What does being dead have to do with your ability to know enough to move things from the "unknown folder" to a "supernatural folder" as per your argument throughout this thread?
Way too funny.
Sorry Charlie but I have never claimed that I could ever move things to a Supernatural folder.
I have said that maybe after I am dead I might be able to but you will have to wait until after I am dead to even try to ask me for an answer and it may be even more difficult to get an answer then.
Plus, there may not even be an answer even then.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Straggler, posted 04-19-2011 2:51 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Straggler, posted 04-19-2011 3:20 PM jar has replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 95 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 74 of 285 (612864)
04-19-2011 3:20 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by jar
04-19-2011 3:01 PM


Re: Is GOD Supernatural?
jar writes:
Sorry Charlie but I have never claimed that I could ever move things to a Supernatural folder.
Indeed. You have stated that nothing - Not even biblical Armageddon - would be placed in the supernatural folder. Anything that could be construed as supernatural would instead be placed in the "unknown folder". I am asking why dying changes that?
jar writes:
I have said that maybe after I am dead I might be able to but you will have to wait until after I am dead to even try to ask me for an answer and it may be even more difficult to get an answer then.
My question to you is then this - Why you think being dead elevates the supernatural folder to a maybe rather than the entirely unnecessary folder you stated it to be when experiencing biblical Armageddon whilst alive.
What is the difference between the two scenarios that demands this change? Why aren't post death experiences also in the "unexplained folder"....?
jar writes:
Plus, there may not even be an answer even then.
Sure. I never said that you claimed that you would have an answer. I just want to know why the folder situation changes.
Edited by Straggler, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by jar, posted 04-19-2011 3:01 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by jar, posted 04-19-2011 3:31 PM Straggler has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 75 of 285 (612866)
04-19-2011 3:31 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by Straggler
04-19-2011 3:20 PM


Re: Is GOD Supernatural?
And I will gladly repeat the answer I have given you.
I don't know. Ask me after I am dead and then I may know.
And I have never mentioned post death experiences. I have said after I am dead. Period. Dead.
Check back then and see if I can give you an answer you like better.
It really is that simple.
Edited by jar, : too many 'a's.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Straggler, posted 04-19-2011 3:20 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by Straggler, posted 04-21-2011 7:15 AM jar has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024