|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,915 Year: 4,172/9,624 Month: 1,043/974 Week: 2/368 Day: 2/11 Hour: 1/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 4735 days) Posts: 283 From: Weed, California, USA Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Movie Paranormal Activity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9202 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.4 |
I agree with you, I think.
I too have no paranormal or supernatural folder. I have an unexplained folder. If I had evidence of the paranormal or the supernatural I might add a folder. I am very skeptical of any evidence being presented. What most people probably have in there paranormal/supernatural folder is in my unexplained folder. The evidence must show it is supernatural, not that it might not be natural. I know there are fictional supernatural characters, but they are fiction so that leaves them out. I can imagine a supernatural character, but that does not put them in a paranormal or supernatural folder, that puts them in the fiction folder. I have no reason to think there could be anything supernatural or paranormal. Therefore, I have no use for a folder for them.Fold Edited by Theodoric, : subtitle Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modulous Member Posts: 7801 From: Manchester, UK Joined: |
I don't care about your stationary, metaphorical or otherwise.
Care to address what I said in plain English without retreating to terse cryptic responses? If you continue to do this I will be forced to conclude you really aren't interested in discussion.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modulous Member Posts: 7801 From: Manchester, UK Joined: |
I too have no paranormal or supernatural folder. I have an unexplained folder. If I had evidence of the paranormal or the supernatural I might add a folder. I am very skeptical of any evidence being presented. What most people probably have in there paranormal/supernatural folder is in my unexplained folder. The evidence must show it is supernatural, not that it might not be natural. Paranormal should be a subfolder within your unexplained folder. There are unexplained things which are not classed paranormal and unexplained things which are classed paranormal. Ghosts, should they exist, are unexplained and paranormal. If we can confirm ghosts exist we still haven't explained them. So they remain in the unexplained folder, but are still filed under 'paranormal'. If we did explain ghosts, in natural scientific terms, it would be 'normal' and be removed from the paranormal folder and the unexplained folder. The only time you should ever move something from a general 'unexplained' folder to the subfolder 'paranormal' is if the unexplained thing is described in further detail that gives it the appropriate attributes to be considered paranormal.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.61803 Member (Idle past 1534 days) Posts: 2928 From: Lone Star State USA Joined: |
Jar writes: "Theres more gravy than the grave about you..."Scrooge I can imagine myself experiencing something like that but absolutely no way to tell if it was just hallucination, a bad burrito or anything else. Edited by 1.61803, : Add Scrooge
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Modulous writes: I too have no paranormal or supernatural folder. I have an unexplained folder. If I had evidence of the paranormal or the supernatural I might add a folder. I am very skeptical of any evidence being presented. What most people probably have in there paranormal/supernatural folder is in my unexplained folder. The evidence must show it is supernatural, not that it might not be natural. Paranormal should be a subfolder within your unexplained folder. There are unexplained things which are not classed paranormal and unexplained things which are classed paranormal. Ghosts, should they exist, are unexplained and paranormal. If we can confirm ghosts exist we still haven't explained them. So they remain in the unexplained folder, but are still filed under 'paranormal'. If we did explain ghosts, in natural scientific terms, it would be 'normal' and be removed from the paranormal folder and the unexplained folder. The only time you should ever move something from a general 'unexplained' folder to the subfolder 'paranormal' is if the unexplained thing is described in further detail that gives it the appropriate attributes to be considered paranormal. Modulous writes: I don't care about your stationary, metaphorical or otherwise. Care to address what I said in plain English without retreating to terse cryptic responses? If you continue to do this I will be forced to conclude you really aren't interested in discussion. Since we are talking about what I can do, what YOU can do is really irrelevant as well as what you think I should have. First, there is no evidence that ghosts exist outside of fiction. Fiction happens to be a known thing. If we could confirm ghosts exist they would still just go in an unknown or unexplained folder. Assigning them to paranormal when we don't have any evidence or indication that paranormal exists is simply silly. Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9202 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.4 |
Paranormal should be a subfolder within your unexplained folder. I disagree. There are many unexplained things, but there is no reason to think any of them are supernatural or paranormal. Ghosts are just an explanation people use to explain the unexplainable. There is no reason to think ghosts exist. Ghost are a fiction to explain the unexplainable. The popular opinion is that ghosts are a paranormal entity, but there is no reason to really think there are ghost. The phenomena attributed them are either explainable or unexplainable due to a lack of data. Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modulous Member Posts: 7801 From: Manchester, UK Joined: |
Since we are talking about what I can do, what YOU can do is really irrelevant as well as what you think I should have.
We aren't talking about what either of us can do, we're talking about what kind of evidence would be required to persuade us of the claims of the paranormal variety. I have no idea exactly what you are referring to with this comment so I can't say anything further.
First, there is no evidence that ghosts exist outside of fiction. Fiction happens to be a known thing. And this thread is not about what evidence there is for ghosts, it's about what evidence would be required to confirm the existence of ghosts.
If we could confirm ghosts exist they would still just go in an unknown or unexplained folder. Assigning them to paranormal when we don't have any evidence or indication that paranormal exists is simply silly. The evidence that they are paranormal is that paranormal is defined by the fact that it is unexplained, and contradictory to normal experience as backed by scientific methodology. Ghosts, should they be confirmed exist would be (at least initially) unexplainable to science and contradictory to the model of reality that science has so far built. This makes it paranormal. Paranormal is not some 'quality' a thing has, it is not some metaphysical voodoo something. It is quite literally a subset of the presently unexplained. 'The paranormal' isn't something that exists or doesn't exist. It is a group of notions about reality that run contradictory to what we experience in a mundane normal routine. Clearly you are using the word in a way that is different than normal usage. Nevertheless, regardless of the semantic argument of whether we should label them paranormal - the OP is quite clearly referring to things such as ghosts and demons. He used the umbrella term presumably because he didn't realize that he'd find his thread dragged into a pointless semantic debate about personal definitions that differ from the norm. So, what evidence would you require to confirm that ghosts exist? No what evidence is there that ghosts exist. Just, what kind of circumstances would you require to occur before you'd accept that ghosts - as I've defined them - exist?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modulous Member Posts: 7801 From: Manchester, UK Joined: |
I disagree. There are many unexplained things, but there is no reason to think any of them are supernatural or paranormal. On the contrary. It isn't that 'paranormal' is a quality a thing has, it just means 'unexplained, and contradictory to normal expectations as buttressed by scientific methodology'. It is a specific brand of the unexplained and mysterious.
ghosts are just an explanation people use to explain the unexplainable. Making whatever ghosts are (assuming they exist), paranormal more or less by definition.
There is no reason to think ghosts exist. But this thread is about what kind of things would be reasons to think ghosts exist. That is: what evidence of the existence of ghosts is required for you to accept their existence?
The popular opinion is that ghosts are a paranormal entity, but there is no reason to really think there are ghost. Ghosts are a paranormal entity. Unless you are saying ghosts are normal? If a ghost turned up, it would be abnormal, yes? It would contravene present day scientific understanding of consciousness, memory storage and so on. It would be: the paranormal.
The phenomena attributed them are either explainable or unexplainable due to a lack of data. We aren't discussing the natural phenomena that you and I agree are the roots to ghost stories. We're talking about what kind of evidence would convince us that ghosts actually exist. How are you defining paranormal? It seems people are using definitions I've never encountered and that this is at the heart of the confusion. The OP is clearly talking about ghosts (actually the film sets up as a ghost story, but the ghosts turn out to be something worse (but also 'paranormal')). So let's say that relatives of the couple in the film say they have evidence of ghosts existing. What would that evidence have to look like to persuade you? Edited by Modulous, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Modulous writes: So, what evidence would you require to confirm that ghosts exist? No what evidence is there that ghosts exist. Just, what kind of circumstances would you require to occur before you'd accept that ghosts - as I've defined them - exist? I would require evidence at a very high level of confidence and repeatability that shows that ghosts are natural. I cannot imagine any evidence that would cause me to place them in a paranormal folder. Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modulous Member Posts: 7801 From: Manchester, UK Joined: |
I would require evidence at a very high level of confidence and repeatability that shows that ghosts are natural. Describe to me a test that would confirm is something, anything is 'natural'.
I cannot imagine any evidence that would cause me to place them in a paranormal folder. How about, the definition of paranormal? I had a whole post about it, but you replied with a cryptic comment about folders. If you are just trying to tell me that you have personally vetoed the term 'paranormal' then just say so. But paranormal has a relatively agreed upon meaning and ghosts are part of the phenomena that are thus labelled. So if a ghost was found, then we have a evidence of one paranormal phenomenon. Paranormal is just a word, not a folder. It means something. What does it mean to you?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Modulous writes: Paranormal is just a word, not a folder. It means something. What does it mean to you? It means that the person using the word feels better or more secure or safer because he can put a label on the unknown. Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modulous Member Posts: 7801 From: Manchester, UK Joined: |
It means that the person using the word feels better or more secure or safer because he can put a label on the unknown. If you like. But that doesn't matter. The label, if you choose to use it or not, exists. And it means something. But forget the word paranormal. Clearly it is a problem. Let's replace the word paranormal with 'ghosts and or demons'. I think ghosts are easier to obtain evidence in favour of them so I've chosen to discuss ghosts. You haven't really described what kind of evidence (other than it must be high level confidence evidence that demonstrates that they are natural, whatever that means) would persuade you that ghosts exist. So spill the beans. Forget that nasty word you disagree with on some metaphysical or linguistic principle and let's move on to the actual topic. To reword the OP:
quote: The answer is no, not really. So let's discuss what would be evidence of real ghosts. Its more interesting than a silly discussion about the meanings of words. Edited by Modulous, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Modulous writes: So let's discuss what would be evidence of real ghosts. Its more interesting than a silly discussion about the meanings of words. I can't imagine evidence of real ghosts. Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modulous Member Posts: 7801 From: Manchester, UK Joined: |
I can't imagine evidence of real ghosts.
Ah well.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9202 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.4 |
Ghosts are a paranormal entity. We may be talking past each other. I do not have any reason to think there is anything paranormal. Ghosts are fiction. Until there is some evidence of any sort they are fiction. Maybe that is paranormal. In my way of thinking giving them the label paranormal is giving some credence to the concept. Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024