If the above is true, the earth's atmosphere and elements on earth and in the atmosphere would skew the dating methodology applied by conventional science.
But how do would these hypothetical events effect dating of moon rocks and meteorites, which have ages which correlate very well with the oldest terrestrial samples?
Most know my unique position on the age of the sun and moon
So your thesis is that the moon and the asteroids (and presumably most of the other bodies of our sloar system) were created significantly before earth (billions of years?), and that the atmospheric conditions of a much younger earth somehow modified the dates from all known dating methods to coincidentally match those from the moon etc?
God must be ROFLing!
Edited by Boof, : Changed 'the flood' to 'atmospheric conditions' as per Buzsaw model
Re: Buz's old Earth/young life perspective - A topic elsewhere
Unfortunately he is banned from the Science forums, maybe you could bring up my query with him in your debate? Namely -
Why do the radiometric ages from lunar and asteroid samples so closely match those from the oldest terrestrial samples, which according to him have been distorted by the pre-flood conditions on Earth? Is it a coincidence or is God playing a joke on us?