Coyote writes:
This was not a fossil. It was an archaeological specimen in a cave, and was found with a variety of artifacts and other materials, many of which were more recent.
coyote do you have a reference link to this particular find?
im interested in seeing the other artifacts that were found with it that were of a more recent time...dont you think that is kind of odd if a 10,000 year old skeleton is found with more recent artifacts?
Im not doubting your information...but i also doubt the carbon dating methods for a few reasons and if the skeleton has been dated older then the artifacts found with it, then i'm intersted in knowing how that is justified.