Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Eye Evolution: Comments about the Great Debate
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5903 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 12 of 30 (66027)
11-12-2003 11:15 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by Minnemooseus
11-12-2003 12:30 AM


I disagree about the "no side comments" suggestion. One of the more interesting aspects of Internet debates I've observed is the way non-participants get to critique and or argue the same questions in a parallel thread. This thread can also be quite useful for the participants themselves as a guage of "how well they're doing". Some debates have improved signficantly when the participants realized they were both getting panned in the Peanut Gallery.
I have seldom seen information or argument presented in a companion thread make its way into the formal debate. OTOH, if info is presented in the companion thread that one or the other participants could realistically use, so what? After all, the thread is open to proponents of either side in the debate.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Minnemooseus, posted 11-12-2003 12:30 AM Minnemooseus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Mammuthus, posted 11-13-2003 3:20 AM Quetzal has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024