|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Summations Only | Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Creation cosmology and the Big Bang | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member
|
What is your understanding of the role played by dark matter and dark energy in the big bang theory?
My understanding is that dark energy and dark matter are used to explain things that are observed in the universe at the current time. We can add a constant to Einstein's equations to accommodate dark energy, but we can model an expanding universe without said constant. Your question is akin to asking how the theory of evolution would change if it turned out there were no brontosauri. Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member
|
am not a newcomer to the Bible or to science and I have never encountered any real scientific evidence that shows me that the Bible and science are incompatible. As for evolution and Big Bang cosmology, they are just bad science and will fade away with new scientific evidence Indeed. Given the ease with which you dismiss scientific evidence that disagrees with you, I think your "never encountered" claim is easy to understand. If evidence or analysis disagrees with you, it is simply wrong, and then labeled not "real". And of course, the standard for looking to cranks and bad science and giving it weight over non-crank science is whether there is agreement with your favorite interpretation of the Bible. What I see here is no different from any of those people who insist that man has never been to the moon or that general relativity is wrong with motivation identical to yours.
I never will intentionally, as you say make false statements about religion or the science to propound my own unsupportable viewpoint. I can accept the statement that you are not intentionally making false statements. But my acceptance does not change the truth that your false statements are motivated by your religious view point. And because of that motivation, there is little incentive to point out the weaknesses in your arguments. You can never accept them. If you cannot address those weaknesses you'll simply be silent about any points made against them. Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given. Edited by NoNukes, : Grammar fixups. Nothing of substanceUnder a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member
|
By all means let us discuss the science. Then do so. Stop the shucking and jiving. Stop evading questions or points made by others. Continuing to insist that the absence of the Higgs means that the BBT is what I expect you to do. But let's not pretend that you haven't been provided with reasons to the contrary. I have yet to see you address any of those points head on. You made a specific complaint regarding problems with the analyses that do not show quantified red shifts, but I have yet to see you address my posts demonstrating that you were wrong in the only case you have yet identified.Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member
|
Do not herald a theory that makes a pseudo prediction about a clean unification prediction and then crashes and burns on a prediction like the Higgs. In other words, you have no response ti Son Goku's argument that the Higgs is inessential to Big Bang cosmology. But you are going to pretend not to concede the point by criticizing particle theory. Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member
|
Now what is your question again? I did not ask you a question. I made an observation about your participation here.
Son Goku has yet to protest about this but I believe my argument was a "missing mechanism" for several processes in universe evolution, like the electroweak epoch. An argument that has been addressed. Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member
|
The Big Bang seems to violate the basic conservation laws of physics... quote and link to quackery omitted.
"Seems" to whom to violate basic conservation laws? Does it seem that way to you? Are you adopting the "science" promoted at the link you provided? If so, perhaps it would be ontopic and worthwhile to spend some effort debunking it. Otherwise, the author of this paper is a fool. If it turns out that you actually hold views in common with Craig Hanks, and I note that your list of things wrong with the big bang theory includes the expansion of space exceeding the velocity of light, then perhaps it would be on topic to discuss the rather obvious problems with this crank's work. Cosmology cranks are a dime a dozen. Craig D. Hanks, in particular is not a physicist. He's just someone whose understanding of physics is not particularly good, but nontheless deigns to hold an opinon on the subject. As best as I can understand Hanks goofy musing, his claim that conservation of energy is broken is based on the fact that energy calculations made in different frames of reference are not consistent. But this is exactly as it should be. He also has the mistaken impression that the expansion of space is a real velocity. So do you, apparently.Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member |
I'm interested.
Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member |
Dark energy is filling the expanded space and growing in a three dimensional way to maintain the same force, thus increasing energy is taking place (if it is energy at all?). If it is energy then it is a contradiction to the conservation of it. How many of the things stated as facts in the above are simply made up by you? 1. The amount of dark energy is growing?2. A constant force is maintained by the dark matter? 3. Increasing energy is taking place? An analogous question: Have you stopped beating your wife yet?Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member |
In your haste to be correct, perhaps you neglected this passage from further on in the same article.
quote: Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member
|
It still seems to say energy is not conserved.
quote: You could not possibly have missed the sentence in the quote I provided in which the author says the exact opposite. Note that the author's two reasons for using a definition of energy that is not conserved are directed primarily at keeping explanations simple for lay people. He explicitly says that the scientists who say that energy is conserved are perfectly correct.Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member
|
I would like to talk about four problem areas for conservation of energy namely Before diving down this rabbit hole, let's remember that your claim is that the Big Bang violates physics. I think Son Goku's responses have shown this to be wrong. Your argument has mutated into "the Big violates physics as Zaius137 would like physics to be". That's a decidedly less interesting proposition. Edited by NoNukes, : Rabbit hole, not whole.Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member |
Here is a paper by Gentry It might be interesting to discuss this "paper". Are you adopting the views in this paper as your own position? Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member |
Well I prefer the term ignorant over fake. You will find I have no self-respect when it comes to learning something. I suppose I could have chosen velocity speed of light velocity of light. Potato/Potatoes It isn't your self-respect that is in question. Some of us are concerned about your respect for others. I understand your concern about being labeled a fake. I don't believe you are a fake. But consider this. You've been pretty adamant about your disdain for FRW, but your questions here about violations of special relativity suggest that you have reached that conclusion while remaining clueless about cosmology. But I know that you are not a fake, but are simply a motivated reader. You are simply parroting back the crank explanations that your fellow creationists have come up with. Your questions are exactly the same as their questions. Explanations for why expansion of space does not result in violations of special relativity can be found in countless places with a minimal search. Even some of the less technically minded participants here have encountered those explanations. Perhaps if you at least acknowledged what everyone else knows and explain why none of that satisfies you, people won't call you a fake. Or not. It's your call. Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member
|
I oppose the Big Bang because it is wrong. Nonsense. You oppose the big bang because you don't like it. You accept contrary crank hypothesis and dismiss criticisms of those hypothesis without regard for the evidence.Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member
|
Hi NoNukes. Could you provide some evidence for the big bang? Actual evidence that supports it. I believe that the link that Panda provided serves as an excellent response to you question regarding evidence for the big bang. I'll also note that a few of the items raised by zaius137 are attempts to refute that evidence. For example zaius cites quantized red shifts to refute some of the evidence that the universe is currently expanding. But he gives extremely short shrift to the evidence that quantized red shifts are not real. In particular, he has made specific, and facially bogus attacks on evidence and analysis producing contrary results and has not responded to showings that his attacks are off base.
What actual evidence is there that makes it a better theory than other theories? What theory or theories did you have in mind? What meaning are you attaching to the word "theory"?Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024