I must say, like Dr. Adequate, I often struggle to understand the meaning of your sentences. I will try to deal with one paragraph as best as I can.
zaius137 writes:
As for the warping of space-time, it stands as an icon of empirical evidence. It is the rock on which shatters fantasies like Quantum gravity or the fictitious Higgs Boson.
I don't really understand how:
(a) Quantum Gravity shatters on the warping of spacetime. The warping of spacetime is a feature of classical gravity, which would be a subset of quantum gravity. It would be like saying Quantum Electrodynamics shatters on the Coloumb potential a standard part of classical electrodynamics. It doesn't since the quantum theories contain the classical theories.
(b) The Higgs boson has nothing to do with the warping of spacetime. Just because physicists deal with and write papers about two topics doesn't mean the two topics themselves are directly related in some way. The Higgs boson has nothing more to do with the warping of spacetime than electric charge or chemistry does.
I mention the Boson here because it is also a casualty of General Relativity in that it cannot impart mass to a black hole.
This doesn't make sense. A Black Hole has the mass of the object that formed it and any additional matter that fell into the black hole. The Higgs boson isn't really involved.
You know that same Black hole that is the stumbling block to unification and man’s pride.
Black holes don't prevent unification in any sense. Could you explain?