marc9000 writes:
The point of this thread is that we should be able to distinguish between useful science and wasteful science, or science that's only intent is to promote the destruction of Christianity.
The key word there is "we".
We are making that distinction whether
you like it or not.
We are society, not just
your little cult.
Our intent is not to promote the destruction of Christianity whether
you think it is or not. If Christianity implodes because of what
we do, that is not
our fault, it's
your fault.
marc9000 writes:
We should recognize the importance of leaving alone mysteries that belong only to God.
We don't know what mysteries belong only to God. If
you think you do, you're pretty arrogant.
marc9000 writes:
I"m not saying that atheists shouldn't be permitted to study their secular curiousities all they want. They should just do on their own time with their own money, and not teach it as fact in public science classes.
It's a matter of secular money being used by secular scientisits for secular purposes. What "should not be" is one religious sect dictating to everybody else what is taboo.
marc9000 writes:
And questioning public searches for atheist support.
I'm not sure if you're making a play on the word "talent" deliberately or inadvertently.