|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,890 Year: 4,147/9,624 Month: 1,018/974 Week: 345/286 Day: 1/65 Hour: 0/1 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: What have we accomplished? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
quote: I’ve proven that I understand it better than you, although that is a low bar, accomplished by reading a couple of web pages - both of which you’ve cited.
quote: I really don’t have to jump through hoops for you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
quote: If that was true I wouldn’t be so successful in pointing out your grievous errors.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
quote: You’re the one asking for it. So, let’s see your understanding. Have you worked out why this claim is wrong yet?
The problem with the Markov Chain models given in the Wikipedia link above is that they are assuming the transition matrix is stationary... ( Message 94 )
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
quote: You certainly don’t let up on the projection. But you’re the one who claim to be the expert. I just claim that you don’t even know as much as I do.
quote: Does this have anything to do with answering my question? If so you’ll have to explain the relevance. Because if you do understand your error rudely asking questions is a rather odd way to admit it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3
|
quote: But you don’t know what’s wrong with your claim. And you don’t even know why you asked:
What initial condition will give equilibrium in 1 replication (generation for a nitwit like you)? quote: Do you really think that resorting to abuse will cover up your failures?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
quote: Then you don’t understand Jukes-Cantor. What’s even worse is that I already explained the problem to you. And you still don’t understand it.
quote: Keep up with the pointless abuse. It just shows what a fraud you are.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
Obviously all you can do is throw abuse.
You certainly can’t handle the math.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
quote: So you tell worse lies. Big deal.
quote: That would only be possible if they were your papers. The evidence of this thread - and the others you are participating in here - indicates that you aren’t capable of having written them. But if you are capable of handling the math, if you aren’t just blowing smoke let’s discuss your corrections to Jukes-Cantor. And the problems you don’t see. So, describe the form of your model. Do you model the changes to each base as a Markov chain as Jukes Cantor does?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3
|
quote: No, I just don’t believe your accusation that evolutionary scientists are to blame. An accusation made without evidence.
quote: The catalog of evasions and errors that make up your posting history.
quote: And look another error and another evasion. You want me to tell you how you decided to fix Jukes-Cantor to make it do something it shouldn’t do. Well I don’t know what you decided to do, because I don’t read minds.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
More evasion. You can’t describe your model because you don’t have one or know how to build one.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
I’ve read those papers. I’m not sure you have. You certainly didn’t read those web pages about the Jukes-Cantor model. Let alone any more authoritative source. Nobody writing a scientific paper relating to that model could be as ignorant of it as you were,
Which is how I know you aren’t writing a paper and don’t have a model.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
If you had a model you could talk about it. You could show that I was wrong. But you don’t because I’m right.
(And you really think that a 2 base Jukes-Cantor would be worth worth doing and a 3 base version isn’t? Message 1891. Oh dear, oh dear.)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3
|
quote: Oh, you mean a model which requires three bases to change? In sequence? Well that isn’t very sensible. Not that the two base model would be worth doing either. Of course models of selection aren’t Jukes-Cantor or corrections of Jukes-Cantor - even if you only track one base. I’m sorry for thinking that you might at least have been considering the real problems of modelling the Kishony experiment with a Markov chain. But there is a very sensible reason why a model that uses selection might want to track three bases and not two. But you don’t know it because you don’t have a model and aren’t even trying to build one.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
quote: Then since I know it well enough to correct your errors on a number of occasions it would follow that you are incapable of creating a corrected version. Not least because you don’t understand what it’s meant to model. So that’s an implicit admission that you have nothing. As for mathematical incompetence:
quote: When I look at that I don’t see a vector equation I see the set of possible states. Why don’t we look at the next line and see what it is?
be the set of possible states for the site, and
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
If I was really that dumb you wouldn’t be so scared of posting your alleged model. Or your arguments.
But thank you for providing more evidence that Creationism is just a silly Satan cult.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024