1) world population
2) strain a developed individual puts on the world vs. that of an undeveloped individual
3) rights of any human to willfully reproduce
4) consequences of uninhibited reproduction as seen by the developed world
5) consequences of uninhibited reproduction as seen by the individuals reproducing
6) consequences of not reproducing (or reproducing little) as seen by the developed world
7) consequences of not reproducing (or reproducing little) as seen by the individuals reproducing
1) Too big.
2) Ok, it depends on the individual in either case. A stereotypical Westerner might be a pointless consumer. They might also be a visionary in any field you choose to name. The latter has more value per unit of strain i'm afraid, pragmatically, than the former.
3) Rights are subjective.
4) I don't think it's about how its seen by the developed world, it's about the future of the species. Not my children, or my cousins children, but the looooong term survival. Most species become extinct. I do accept the percieved survival requirements of the individual, but it is not enough to outweigh the consequences.
5) Depends on the individual. I have the priviledge of living in the city in the UK with the highest proportion of teenage pregnancies. It's a small city, and I can tell you that most pregnant teenagers in this city are ignorant. They breed for benefit, the more children the more money they recieve. This seems mildly analogous to the scenario in the developing world. My friends are reluctant to reproduce because of the world they will be bringing a new consciousness into.
6 and 7 seem to be the other end of 4 and 5.
I hope it is clear that I feel that wanton reproduction is wrong all round.