Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Oh those clever evolutionists: Question-begging abiogenesis
FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4175 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003


Message 124 of 301 (248895)
10-04-2005 3:43 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by Faith
10-04-2005 2:12 PM


Re: But that's not what SHE said
Faith writes:
The complexity of the naturalistic processes makes their random occurrence Highly Unlikely, and this contributes to the evidence for a Designer.
First off, the process is not random, but you alreay know this.
Second, no matter how unlikely the process is, it in no way contributes to the evidence for a designer. How can you not understand this?
It seems that you are of the opinion that it's either one or the other. Tecnhically, it could be argued that it's natural processess (evolution) against hundreds, if not thouasands of alternate, Goddidit ideas. What evidence (there's that word again...the one you seem to ignore..."evidence") do you have that your idea, your God, has a higher probablilty of being correct than any other religions idea of how life came about?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by Faith, posted 10-04-2005 2:12 PM Faith has not replied

FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4175 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003


Message 159 of 301 (249097)
10-05-2005 11:43 AM
Reply to: Message 137 by Faith
10-05-2005 1:05 AM


Re: My answer once again
Faith writes:
Actually I haven't claimed anything EXCEPT that the "astronomical improbability of abiogenesis" leaves us with the only reasonable alternative explanation for the indisputable fact that "life is here." A Designer.
You seem determined in believing that "astronomical odds" means that the result of the event is designed. Why? You can in no way support this claim. You are basically stating that things with long odds can’t possibly happen without Devine intervention, which is nonsense.
Just use yourself as an example. Do you understand anything at all about meiosis? Well, just in case, here’s a very simple (and mostly incorrect) explanation of the process. During meiosis the chromosome count of reproductive cells (gametes) is reduced by half. This, of course, insures that upon the formation of a zygote (a fertilized egg), the chromosome count is "restored" to the diploid number. For example, humans have 23 pairs of homologous chromosomes (46 total = diploid). This means that our gametes each contain only of each pair, for a total of 23 chromosomes (= haploid). When we reproduce, the other half is supplied by our mate and the offspring has a chromosome count of 46 again (haploid + haploid = diploid).
During meiosis a single diploid cell will eventually become four haploid cells (well, four for guys but only one functional cell for women, but that’s nether here nor there), but as to not complicate things any more that necessary, I’m going to ignore how you get four from one. However, also during meiosis an event called "Independent Assortment" occurs, which basically states that when the chromosome count is reduced from 46 to 23, how each pair separates into a “new” cell is independent of how any other pair may separate. This process will be my the focus from here on out.
Maybe it would help to think of your chromosomes as pairs of shoes. Let’s say you have 23 pairs of shoes in your closet (and your mate has 23 pairs in his). Now let’s say you want to make a third closet of 23 pairs, with (23 individual shoes) coming from you, and the other half (23 individual shoes) coming from him. Well, in order to do this you must first reduce your closet count by half (as does he, but we’ll just focus on your shoes for now). This is an extremely oversimplified explanation of what happens during meiosis. You take of each pair of shoes (for a total of 23) and put them in a new closet. But which shoe (right or left) from each pair do you choose? For any given pair you choose (whether it's the right or the left), that choice will play no role whatsoever in which shoe from any other pair you choose. That’s independent assortment, and it results in a large number of possible “right/left” combinations.
Ok, so now let me ask you this. How many different ways can you separate just your shoes? In other words, if you needed a separate closet for each possible arrangement of shoes, how many closets would you need? For example, let’s say that in the “first” closet you placed all of the right shoes. You now have closet number one with 23 right shoes. But of course, that’s not the only way you could have done it, is it? So now let’s say that instead you did it as follows: In closet number two you place the left shoe of the first pair, and for the remaining pairs you used the rights. That’s another closet now filled with 23 shoes ( of each pair) arranged such that you have 1 left from pair number one and 22 rights from pairs two through twenty-three. In yet another arrangement (closet number three) you place the right shoe for pair number two and for the remaining 22 pairs (pair one, and pairs 3 -23) you used the lefts. Continue this process until you have used every pair of shoes in every possible right/left combination. How many closets would you need? Would it surprise you to know that you would need 8,388,608 closets. And to make matters even worse, your mate would require that same number. Now think for a moment, of the number of different ways you can “recombine” your closets with his, in order to get a “new” closet of 23 pairs ( from you and from him). For any given “new” closet, you have over 8 million closest to choose from, as does he.
So now, what are the odds that you, Faith, actually exist as you are? Remember, the odds are greater than eight million to one that the possible chromosomes supplied to you by your mother were the ones you would end up with. And the odds are greater than eight million to one that the other half, supplied by your father, were the ones you would end up with. So, the odds against you having the chromosomes that you do are 70,400,000,000,000 to 1 (8,388,608 X 8,388,608) . imagine! Now factor in the odds of your mother receiving the chromosomes she did as well as your father, and then factor in your grandparents and great grandparents...and by going back only three generations you get a staggeringly HUGE number against the probability that you would eventually end up as you are now . but yet it happened.
(Also keep in mind that another event occurs during meiosis called “Cross Over”, which throws a monkey wrench into the whole process by swapping portions of homologous chromosomes prior to Independent Assortment occurring. So the odds I just gave you are a “best case” scenario . the actual odds are even greater!)
Are you the result on Devine intervention, Faith, or are you simply the result of “random” events that resulted in you getting the chromosomes that you did? My claim (and RAZD’s as I understand him) is that the odds are meaningless because here you are . as you are. The probability is one. You, however, cannot grasp the fact that even things with long odds happen every day without the need to call upon some sort of Devine intervention.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by Faith, posted 10-05-2005 1:05 AM Faith has not replied

FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4175 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003


Message 177 of 301 (249157)
10-05-2005 3:21 PM
Reply to: Message 171 by Faith
10-05-2005 2:51 PM


Re: My answer once again
Faith writes:
Nonsense. The supporting evidence for a Creator far outstrips the evidence for abiogenesis, but you discount the evidence for a Creator on some artifical definition of what "science" is.
Ok, Faith, what is our "artifical" definition of science? Oh, and by the way, when are you going to supply ANY supporting evidence for a Creator? Saying that the odds against abiogenesis are high IS NOT evidence for a Creator. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by Faith, posted 10-05-2005 2:51 PM Faith has not replied

FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4175 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003


Message 257 of 301 (249402)
10-06-2005 8:08 AM
Reply to: Message 195 by Faith
10-05-2005 5:11 PM


Re: My answer once again
Faith writes:
Nope, I'm arguing that since it is extremely rare, it is evidence for a Creator.
Faith, as I explained in an earlier post, the odds against you having the genome you do are greater than Seventy-trillion to one...but yet, here you are. Are you (and every other person on this planet) the result of Devine intervention?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by Faith, posted 10-05-2005 5:11 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 258 by Percy, posted 10-06-2005 8:53 AM FliesOnly has replied
 Message 278 by Faith, posted 10-06-2005 10:44 AM FliesOnly has not replied

FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4175 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003


Message 259 of 301 (249420)
10-06-2005 9:32 AM
Reply to: Message 258 by Percy
10-06-2005 8:53 AM


Re: My answer once again
Percy writes:
Why would Dan Devine (mhrip) be performing genomic interventions?
Ummm..because I can't spell Divine? But on the other hand, Notre Dame seems to be doing better this year....coincidence...or maybe there's something to be said for Faith's position.
PS: I loathe ND though..GO BLUE!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 258 by Percy, posted 10-06-2005 8:53 AM Percy has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024