Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,900 Year: 4,157/9,624 Month: 1,028/974 Week: 355/286 Day: 11/65 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The word Man is inherently confusing/sexist? Oh the huMANity!
ReverendDG
Member (Idle past 4139 days)
Posts: 1119
From: Topeka,kansas
Joined: 06-06-2005


Message 22 of 90 (344011)
08-27-2006 5:17 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by xXGEARXx
08-27-2006 3:31 AM


Re: ?
Forgive me for intruding...
no problems, after all this is a dabate forum
All of this is really worth debating?? Please, don't slam me too hard for asking...lol...
I agree with you it isn't really worth debating, coming up with new terms for things that to me work, it seems like muddling the water and making commuication worse than it is already
Seems apparent word usage is deciphered in context. Why all the fuss?
because some people take on an extreme that verges on the insane.
for example i remember this from english comp lit 1, the tracher (who happened to be female) considered it stupid that from the 60's on people promoted the idea of changing the useage of "his" if the person wasn't identified to thier. Not only is the idea of using thier for the gender neutral is confusing, it is also awkward since thier is more than one person in normal human useage
(i maybe misremembering about this, but i hope not)
i also feel the idea of such things as chairman to chairperson,etc are rather silly, but i guess man is becoming more of a gender label than it used to be
Edited by ReverendDG, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by xXGEARXx, posted 08-27-2006 3:31 AM xXGEARXx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024