Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What Is "Intellectual Dishonesty"?
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4024 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 38 of 49 (145783)
09-29-2004 7:34 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by johnfolton
09-29-2004 3:16 PM


Re: Evolutionists Dating Methods Intellectually Dishonest
[P.S. Granted life grows from the sediments, but that does not mean the fossils entombed are the age of the substances they grew from, is not that why they date rocks by other atomic decay methodologies, and organic life by C14, proven by Andrew Snelling with a petrified wood sample]
Is this the same geologist that publishes in both scientific and Creo journals with diametrically-opposed positions?
Edited to tighten up.
This message has been edited by Nighttrain, 09-29-2004 06:38 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by johnfolton, posted 09-29-2004 3:16 PM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by johnfolton, posted 09-29-2004 11:02 PM Nighttrain has replied

  
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4024 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 40 of 49 (145882)
09-30-2004 1:21 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by johnfolton
09-29-2004 11:02 PM


I believe Snelling is a YEC, yet he writes of radiometric dating of ancient deposits.
I think the refusal to publish Creationist articles might have more to do with the value of the contents than the approach. And having (or not)personal intellectual honesty might colour one`s reputation. However, with the freedom to publish whatever one wants (within legal limits) means there is nothing to stop Creationist organisations setting up a independent publication with peer-reviewed articles from both sides of the fence.I`m sure there would be a lot of evo-minded individuals, tiring of waiting for publication in the recognised journals, who would be prepared to offer their articles if the new publication maintained even-handedness. Might set an example to those biased journals you blame.:-)
P.S. lay off the 'infidels' tag, or I'll start talking about religious nut-cases.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by johnfolton, posted 09-29-2004 11:02 PM johnfolton has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024