Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 0/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Polar ice caps and possible rise in sea level
Admin
Director
Posts: 13040
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.2


Message 20 of 86 (142951)
09-17-2004 3:57 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Robert Byers
09-17-2004 3:46 PM


i gave a answer and you use the opputunity to just make a gereral denunciation against the time honoured belief of Christianity.
I think you misunderstood where the replies, including from Moose, are coming from. If you accept flood geology as a religious belief, then I think no one here would have a problem with that. But if you further believe that there is scientific support for flood theory and that it should be part of science, then the evidentiary questions make sense.
This is the proper forum for discussing flood theory from a scientific perspective. If you wish to discuss it from a more theological perspective then you should propose a topic for the [forum=-6] forum.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Robert Byers, posted 09-17-2004 3:46 PM Robert Byers has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13040
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.2


Message 28 of 86 (143051)
09-18-2004 9:58 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by wmscott
09-18-2004 9:27 AM


Re: Hydroisostasy & LGM
wmscott writes:
There are two very long threads on this board on "Solving the Mystery of the biblical Flood", I suggest that you look them over to answer the questions you have. I don't have the time to educate you on the many basic points that you seem to need instruction on.
EvC Forum is a discussion board, with the emphasis on discussion. While members are encouraged to provide references that support or augment their arguments, the actual arguments and relevant information should be provided in the discussion thread. This applies even when the exact same arguments and information have been provided in other threads, and especially when those other threads are old and hundreds of messages long. In particular, members are not required or asked to read any thread other than the one their participating in.
Naturally this has to be moderated with common sense. There will be times when it makes sense to simply refer someone to a message in another thread (but not to an entire thread, unless it is very short). And there will be times when even though the information is present in the current thread, just telling someone to "read the thread" isn't really practical when the thread is hundreds of messages long, and so the specific message should be called out or the same information provided again in a new message.
We approach discussion this way because when a member takes the position that other threads or other material should be read before another member can participate in the current thread, it is usually an evasive technique.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by wmscott, posted 09-18-2004 9:27 AM wmscott has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024