Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,878 Year: 4,135/9,624 Month: 1,006/974 Week: 333/286 Day: 54/40 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Playboy made me do it
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1495 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 57 of 183 (224287)
07-17-2005 6:12 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by arachnophilia
07-17-2005 5:23 PM


makeup is generally an undesired feature ("what is she hiding?"). personally, i find makeup unattractive.
If you're seeing the makeup then you're looking at a woman who doesn't know how to apply it. What you're thinking of as "no makeup" actually represents a fair amount of makeup. This is what you learn if you do any serious textbook study into makeup.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by arachnophilia, posted 07-17-2005 5:23 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by arachnophilia, posted 07-17-2005 6:19 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1495 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 59 of 183 (224291)
07-17-2005 6:25 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by roxrkool
07-16-2005 7:05 PM


Re: Just for you Schraf!
Look, I once dropped 250 for an iPod Mini. Did I need one? Probably not; objectively there are better MP3 players out there. Probably I was influenced by how cool people think they are.
But I bought one anyway; it was my money to spend on what I pleased.
These women wanted something. So long as they were appraised of the risks and chose to do it anyway, who are any of you to second-guess them? Freedom means that some people are going to do things you think are stupid or risky. Vagina reduction surgery? Yeah, people should be satisfied with the body that they have. But that doesn't always work for everybody. Nobody compelled these women to have surgery; a few rude remarks don't make your free will evaporate.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by roxrkool, posted 07-16-2005 7:05 PM roxrkool has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by roxrkool, posted 07-18-2005 2:06 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1495 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 119 of 183 (224523)
07-18-2005 9:33 PM
Reply to: Message 117 by arachnophilia
07-18-2005 9:28 PM


"dude," it's called SEVENTEEN.
think about that for a second.
Oh, yeah, and cigarettes marketed with cartoons can't possibly be targeted to children, because you have to be 18 to smoke!
Look, I read a magazine called "Harper's." You don't have to be a harper to read it; in fact it has nothing to do with harps or harping. Yes, the magazine is called "Seventeen." Yes, the magazine is targeted at girls younger than that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by arachnophilia, posted 07-18-2005 9:28 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by arachnophilia, posted 07-18-2005 10:35 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1495 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 122 of 183 (224538)
07-18-2005 10:40 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by arachnophilia
07-18-2005 10:35 PM


if this is really as dangerous and schraf thinks, wouldn't it also be a problem for seventeen and co?
Yeah, probably. Personally I don't think it's as dangerous as Schraf thinks, but there's an undeniable angle of marketing something that influences children in a potentially negative way.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by arachnophilia, posted 07-18-2005 10:35 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by arachnophilia, posted 07-19-2005 12:01 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024