Biogeography falsifies the worldwide flood.

Oh boy! So now mammals and marsupials are the same "kind"? Is that what you are saying!????Before you answer you had better understand that NONE of the creationist sources ( like AIG and ICR ) will agree with you. You also have to understand that you have to live with the consequences of this.Also this is such an astonishing statment that is so different than any one has put forward before that I have to ask you what the dividing line between kinds is then?Just how do you tell when one critter and another critter are different kinds? Can we examine the genes involved? Do we just go on what they look like?With marsupials and mammals in the same kind there can't be all that many kinds altogether can there? Would you like to list some example kinds starting with the marmal "kind" (that is the kind which includes mammals and marsupials).

You have yet to be brave enough to define kinds? You said a "wolf is a wolf". Does that mean you have the tasmaian wolf and timber work in the same kind or not? But that isn't the DNA that is being examined in every case so this idea is, like the rest of your made up ideas, wrong.

Seems you're not actually back yet. No evidence? What you mean is you don't know anything about the evidence available.Please review and add to:
Genetic evidence of primate evolutionA courtroom is not a scientific laboratory. This is not relevant at all.

So sorry to see you go. It's a shame you learned nothing at all.