Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   YECs, how do you explain meandering canyons?
YEC
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 43 (169291)
12-17-2004 7:43 AM


A simple answer.
As A YEC, I would expect meandering canyons. In fact the question should be asked of the old earthers.
Why?
Prior to the formation of the Grand Canyon it is suggested that there was several rather large lakes (Grand and Hopi) held in place by a debris dam.
These lakes released some water that allowed a slow erosion of the not quite hard sediment carving a meandering template into the ground.
Later in time the debris dam broke suddenly and the water from the lakes rushed through the meandering channels and made the wider and deeper.
In the old earth model as the land rose up the Colorado river would have cut sideways or horizontal across the strata and not downwards as they claim. The meanders would have been impossible using the old earthers models.
The original poster of this thread is also correct. That is if the waters rapidly left the lakes with out a previous template/channel for the water to follow meanders might not occur, BUT the original poster has an even more diifficult problem explaining how the slow rising land formed meanders.

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by JonF, posted 12-17-2004 9:42 AM YEC has not replied
 Message 8 by Coragyps, posted 12-17-2004 11:06 AM YEC has not replied
 Message 10 by roxrkool, posted 12-17-2004 12:40 PM YEC has not replied

  
YEC
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 43 (169327)
12-17-2004 10:37 AM


JonF
Sorry, if that had happened we would see much more extreme erosion on the outside of the bends, since the rushing water would exert enormous force on the outside walls as the water changed direction suddently. We don't see that. Your scenario is falsified.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Wnat???? Reference please.
This message has been edited by YEC, 12-17-2004 10:38 AM

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by NosyNed, posted 12-17-2004 10:41 AM YEC has not replied
 Message 9 by JonF, posted 12-17-2004 11:17 AM YEC has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024