Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   YECs, how do you explain meandering canyons?
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1018 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 10 of 43 (169391)
12-17-2004 12:40 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by YEC
12-17-2004 7:43 AM


Re: A simple answer.
I haven't heard of Grand Lake. Do you have a link that references this lake so I can see where it is located?
As someone pointed out, eroding "not quite hard sediment" would not result in cliffs. The non-lithified, water-saturated sediment would slump constantly, forming shallow walls and a wide bed. However, you first need to explain how all that sediment was deposited in the first place. Walt Brown says by the flood.
Hopi Lake at least is likely (not sure about Grand Lake, but both could possibly be the result of post-flood, water-filled basins) and in order to get meanders, you need a relatively flat-lying land surface - that means no Colorado Plateau/uplift, yet.
So okay, you have the meanders set in "not quite hard sediment."
However, when was the Colorado Plateau uplifted? There is up to 7,000 feet difference between rocks found in the canyon and the same rocks found in other parts of the southwest. Additionally, HOW was it uplifted? No matter how much water burst from those dams, they are not going to carve canyons through a 9,000+ ft. mountain of material. The water would go around. Therefore you need to uplift the Plateau before the dam bursts.
YEC writes:
In the old earth model as the land rose up the Colorado river would have cut sideways or horizontal across the strata and not downwards as they claim. The meanders would have been impossible using the old earthers models.
I'm sorry, that makes no sense. What do you mean the river would cut sideways and horizontal across the strata? That's actually a better explanation for how floods work. They tend to form wide anastomosing braided stream environments full of gravel and other transported material.
The original poster of this thread is also correct. That is if the waters rapidly left the lakes with out a previous template/channel for the water to follow meanders might not occur, BUT the original poster has an even more diifficult problem explaining how the slow rising land formed meanders.
Slow rising lands NEVER form meanders. Who told you that? The meanders were in place prior to uplift, which is also required for your model, though you failed to touch on that aspect.
Mainstream science can explain the haphazard path of the Colorado River, the meanders, the uplift, how the rocks got there in the first place, how the lowest and oldest rocks in the canyon were formed, etc.
YECs can't. You have a lot more to explain than just meanders.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by YEC, posted 12-17-2004 7:43 AM YEC has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by tsig, posted 12-18-2004 1:33 PM roxrkool has not replied
 Message 15 by TheLiteralist, posted 12-18-2004 10:13 PM roxrkool has not replied

  
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1018 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 24 of 43 (170299)
12-20-2004 10:10 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Buzsaw
12-18-2004 7:57 PM


buzsaw writes:
If there were a big rush bringing down a huge quantity of soft sediment, the meandering possibly could occur subsequently as a fairly strong but not rushing amount of water continued down the now relatively, I say relatively, level sediment which would be deep but still quite soft. We see this sometimes on a small scale where erosion occurs in soft sediment of fairly gradual slopes.
Sort of like a beach environment? You get small-scale meanders on a beach after most of the water had drained off. Or at the end of a flood - a normal flood! Yes, this is possible.
After the meandering is shaped, though yet fairly shallow, surging water from a succession of other small outbreaks or pockets of water upstream could cut the now shaped meandering much deeper rather quickly.
Yes, I believe this is also true, at least the first part, as long as you keep the water surges small enough so that they do not flow over and across the meanders, which would wipe them out. However, I don't think it would necessarily be very quick.
The only time you could increase the amount of water and erode quickly would be after rather deep incision of the meanders into hard rock - not soft sediment or even weakly lithified rock.
Before you can deepen the meanders, the rock must lithify completely. Otherwise all you'll be doing is causing slope and bank failure and widening the channel in the unlithified sediment.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Buzsaw, posted 12-18-2004 7:57 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1018 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 25 of 43 (172148)
12-29-2004 5:34 PM


No comments, Buz???

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024