"TC, the key is to define the exact strata (globally correlatable) marking the onset and end of the flood. You can, for convenience, use the standard geologic column to supply your answer. We will understand that from your point of view the geologic column was laid down in a short time."
--After reeding, my view hasn't changed, I set Flood sediments at Cambrian --> Tertiary deposits.
"By naming the exact sequence of strata, we can begin to discuss things like paleosols and how the hell they formed in a global tempest (among the host of other questions you have yet to answer)."
--Yes we can, and concerning paleosols, they of course are not going to form under water, so the existance of paleosols in my view currently would show a time when water had not covered an area during the flood, not sure how many other deposits would form if the earth were totally covered with water such as evaporites and the like.
"By the way TC, your youthful approach to actually try and find the data is refreshing. Most creationists avoid details such as this like the plague. Perhaps it's because they learned a long time ago that the evidence is against them when details come out."
--Yes unfortunatelly, perhaps. I can say that it is a bit sad how little many creationists know of science, nor how to deal with it, most of the time I get rather frustrated when creationists bud in and attempt to support me (atleast with my chatroom experience). They really don't know much of what they are talking about. While the opponents are sometimes in the same perdicament or they do infact have a sufficient scientific background. I could say however that there are some creationists here that are or may progress in their scientific mind-set.
"You have not yet figured that out and jump gung-ho into trying to supply us with data. Right, wrong, good or bad, it is admirable for such a young person."
--I'll take this as complementary, thank you Joe
------------------