Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Back to the fundamentals
Watson
Inactive Member


Message 48 of 65 (27790)
12-24-2002 1:31 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Minnemooseus
01-04-2002 2:00 AM


Yes Mr.Moose I can explain how the great flood happened. I am not
a scientist or a creationist I am a realist! I do have a lot of
theory, but lets start with basic facts. I also know this was a
world flood but you have to start someplace, I would like to start
with the great lakes someplace everyone can relate to. Get out your
RAND McNALLY road atlas and find the finger lakes south east of
Rochester NY. This clearly shows the direction of the glacial movement
North to South. Take a trip to the finger lakes, walk the escarpment
Look at the rocks I did. I could not find any heat generated rocks
associated with glacial movement. Now look at the direction of the
niagarafalls escarpment east to west. common sense tells me the
glacier had nothing to do with Niagara. The bathymetry of Lake Erie
1998 Published by the National Geophysical Data Center clearly shows
the Niagara Escarpment continue to the west about a 100 miles
forming a 35mile wide impact creator made of heat generated rocks
I have sent these heat generated rocks in for testing to many
labs and found no answer to there origin. I know there is a lot of
politics involved in keeping this quite. I know an asteroid was
responsible for the great flood. I would like to prove it with
hands on facts.
------------------
watson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Minnemooseus, posted 01-04-2002 2:00 AM Minnemooseus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by gene90, posted 01-01-2003 7:46 PM Watson has replied

  
Watson
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 65 (28319)
01-02-2003 2:47 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by gene90
01-01-2003 7:46 PM


Check out the Bathymetry of Lake eries eastern basin and tell me
what you see. Published by the National Geophysical Data Center
in 1998.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by gene90, posted 01-01-2003 7:46 PM gene90 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by gene90, posted 01-02-2003 3:52 PM Watson has replied

  
Watson
Inactive Member


Message 52 of 65 (28333)
01-02-2003 8:35 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by gene90
01-02-2003 3:52 PM


The Department of health in Erie Pennsylvania Will tell you who
is sand dredging that area. You could get good samples from them.
There has been core samples taken of that area. I know this because
there was talk of a pipeline being put across the west brim.
I would have to do a little research, I know I could find out for you
Who did the core samples. There is a much easier way to find samples.
Just walk along the shoreline west of that crator, Look in the rockey
areas not the sandy. If you have a cheep metal detector take it with
you so you can tell what rocks have metal. The common glass rocks
will be green some are bluegreen and some are blue green and yellow.
The best time to find them is about 2pm when the sun is high and
thay will stand right out. The rocks also can be cut and polished
and made into jewelry. The rocks are between 7&8 Hardness except
for the yellow it"s much softer. I have sent samples to numerous
Labs across the country and still no one has comeup with an origen.
THANKS WATSON

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by gene90, posted 01-02-2003 3:52 PM gene90 has not replied

  
Watson
Inactive Member


Message 53 of 65 (28863)
01-11-2003 1:45 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by gene90
01-02-2003 3:52 PM


Gene 90
I have been analyzing the rocks six years before that
topagraphy map existed. I don't believe the goverment persay
is keeping this creator quite. I do believe a few at the the
top are makeing a fast buck indirectley, And the Existence of
this would kill there money flow. Gene there is alot more hear
than just the creator. I have found three ancient foundrys that
was smelting this material. The bases to these foundrys need to
be tested. Also I have a burial mound 30 feet wide 175 long
15 feet high, the mound dates 1340.aprox. The bottom has a clay
floor with a 2 foot sand layer on top, on top of the sand layer
is 4 inches of mortar The mortar is made of meteorite crust.
Meteorite crust is used in ancient cement. The question I have
is how much meteorite crust does it take to make enough cement
to cover a area 4 inches high 30 feet wide and 175 feet long?
The canadion Geo survay has the core samples you want.
Why Havn't you responded to this. I gave you the location
of a new creator on a silver platter, I know your a smart man,
Please respond.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by gene90, posted 01-02-2003 3:52 PM gene90 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by John, posted 01-11-2003 2:08 PM Watson has replied
 Message 59 by gene90, posted 01-12-2003 3:59 PM Watson has replied

  
Watson
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 65 (28879)
01-11-2003 6:27 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by John
01-11-2003 2:08 PM


Thanks for the database.
Can you explain the glass rocks with metal spheers.
How about quarts that is a diamond hardness with metalspheres
inside. can you explain? These are things I can pic up and
hold in my hand, Thay are real. Watson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by John, posted 01-11-2003 2:08 PM John has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by John, posted 01-11-2003 6:34 PM Watson has replied
 Message 61 by gene90, posted 01-12-2003 4:11 PM Watson has not replied

  
Watson
Inactive Member


Message 57 of 65 (28913)
01-12-2003 2:34 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by John
01-11-2003 6:34 PM


Thanks for your reply
Can you do your own analysis of the rocks? Most asteroids when
thay impact are totally destroyed. This one is different, I beleive
this one slamed into the glaciers and the ice contained a lot of it.
I can send you some pictures. Where would you like to start?
There is a lot hear. Thanks Watson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by John, posted 01-11-2003 6:34 PM John has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by John, posted 01-12-2003 3:39 PM Watson has not replied

  
Watson
Inactive Member


Message 65 of 65 (29138)
01-14-2003 8:13 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by gene90
01-12-2003 3:59 PM


I sent you some pictures. Maybe this will help.
I know this is all new to you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by gene90, posted 01-12-2003 3:59 PM gene90 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024