I had to prove my point to the full extent.
But all you provided was assertion after assertion. You don't even have a logical structure that would result in a valid conclusion. Therefore nothing was proven.
msg 33 writes:
And don't go telling me you have proof of your time line through carbon dating either. Carbon dating is completely inacurate. Certain things in the soil mess it up sometimes. One time about three hours away from my own Georgia home, Evolutionists ran carbon dating test on the burnt soil of a small town that had burnt to the ground 30 years earlier. The test said it was a million year old city! So much for your carbon dates.
You have been (at best) misinformed. "Evolutionists" wouldn't do that because they know that the practical limits of carbon dating is only 50,000 years max, and that NOTHING can be dated to a million years by any known carbon dating method.
Rather than encumber this thread with the other fallacies involved here (
not least of which is that invalidating carbon dating does not invalidate an old earth, OR that the geological evidence is entirely lacking for any ww flood scenario) take the challenge to answer on the
{Age Correlations and an Old Earth: Part III} thread. I'm betting you won't.
Denial of evidence is what determines the level of dogmatic belief.
Enjoy.
This message has been edited by RAZD, 03*30*2006 07:51 AM
™ Version 4.2