Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,918 Year: 4,175/9,624 Month: 1,046/974 Week: 5/368 Day: 5/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Are there any substitutes for having inner peace?
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 46 of 300 (223212)
07-11-2005 6:23 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by CK
07-11-2005 6:21 PM


Re: crashfrog the witness
Charles, you're gross. You've always got your head in the gutter.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by CK, posted 07-11-2005 6:21 PM CK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by CK, posted 07-11-2005 6:26 PM robinrohan has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 47 of 300 (223213)
07-11-2005 6:26 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by robinrohan
07-11-2005 6:23 PM


Re: crashfrog the witness
Deleted - cannot be bothered to carry this one on.
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 11-Jul-2005 06:28 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by robinrohan, posted 07-11-2005 6:23 PM robinrohan has not replied

Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4046
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 48 of 300 (223219)
07-11-2005 7:01 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by wmscott
07-11-2005 5:34 PM


Re: Reality-the quality or state of being real.
Then it is not True inner peace if it doesn't come from God. You can find inner peace without God, but it is only a relative type of peace.
PROVE IT!!!!!! Prove that you can not find equally strong inner peace without God. Many people on this very forum are telling you that they have done EXACTLY THAT.
The only religion today that really follows the Bible is Jehovah's Witnesses.
That’s an awfully bigoted and self-righteous statement. Ten people can read the Bible and come up with ten different interpretations of its True meaning. To say that your religion’s interpretation is the only possible correct one without anything to back it up is awfully arrogant.
Your peace is one of death, mine is of hope, that is why I say your peace isn't true or real.
Isn’t true or real? An atheist could say, Well, you can’t show that your God exists, and I think your beliefs are unfounded and that you are wrong. Therefore, your inner peace isn’t as strong as mine and it’s not real. He would be just as wrong as you are.
In this discussion, it should be merely necessary to prove that the Bible contains elements that could not have been of human origin to prove it as having a supernatural source.
You have got to be kidding me. Greek/Roman Mythology contains just as many elements that could not have been of human origin as the Bible.
First let us consider what the Bible is not by a brief comparison to the Book Of Mormon. The BOM has no historical background, there is no BOM archeology any more than there is Oz archeology. Shortly after the BOM was published, numerous historical errors were pointed out that clearly revealed the book to be a complete fraud. DNA studies have also conclusively proven beyond any shadow of a doubt, that the Jewish migration to the Americas described in the BOM, never occurred. Repeatedly the BOM has over and over again been completely discredited as being historically true, and there has never been presented any historical evidence that clearly supported any of the events as having taken place. That is what a complete fraud looks and smells like.
Wow. No, you aren’t arrogant or bigoted at all. Shall we go through the lack of historical evidence for biblical events? Direct evidence to the contrary of what it literally states?
Then there is the great age of the Bible which is frequently stated to be the oldest of all the major religious books.
So.the fact that the book is really old is the reason you believe it to be true? If I found a book buried in the ground dated to be about 20,000 years old that told of the exploits of the Giant Flying Spaghetti Monster, would it have any validity? After all, it’s really old, older than the Bible.
Some critics claim some portions were written later then stated, but there little to support such claims so there is no real reason that things were not written as claimed.
Some believers claim some portions were written earlier than has been shown by analysis, but there is little to support such claims so there is no real reason that things were written so long ago.
My last side point I want to mention, is that the Bible is literature, it is well written. Most ancient religious books are not. Even the books are not part of the Word of God that some tried to add the Bible, are from what I have seen, of a noticeably lower writing caliber, like someone tried to slip a few pages of a comic book into a well written book.
So the literary quality of the author gives credence to its validity?! A third grade student can explain in relatively poor literary fashion exactly why the sky is blue. As long as he gets the science right, does it matter if it equals Shakespeare in a literary sense?
The power and beauty contained in the pages of the Bible are breath taking and is universally acknowledged
No, it’s not. The brutality, bigotry, and general evil of many of the events in the Bible (slaying of the firstborn of Egypt, killing 3000 friends and neighbors because they worshipped an idol when the Ten Commandments were given, etc.) are often noted, however.
Considering how important the Bible's claim of being the word of God is, it is an issue that each person should really consider the evidence in detail for themselves to make their own informed discission rather than taking the word of others.
Yes, people SHOULD look at evidence. I’m still waiting for you to provide some for your earlier assertions.
The most obvious point and also the most frequently cited, is that the Bible contains very specific prophecies that were fulfilled right down to the last detail.
.in the Bible! The prophesies were fulfilled in the same collection of books! Robert Jordan’s Wheel of Time series contains prophesies that are fulfilled to the last detail in later books. That doesn’t make it real!
This prophecy by itself is enough to prove a supernatural influence in the writing of the Bible, and yet it is only one of many prophecies found in the book of Daniel, and Daniel is but one of the many prophetic books of the Bible.
No, it’s not. Norse mythology contains prophesies that were fulfilled in various myths. That doesn’t prove that they happened! A book CANNOT prove itself! Only EVIDENCE can prove or disprove anything.
This has strayed far from your original topic. If you wish to debate the validity of the Bible and it’s literal accuracy, there is another forum for that. I’m sure the moderators would encourage you to start a new topic there rather than hijacking your own thread.
This discussion is a debate to determine if non-Judeo-Christians can possess a sense of peace as strong as those who believe in God. You STILL have provided no real evidence. The Bible tells me so is an appeal to authority fallacy. Provide evidence for your claim or concede!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by wmscott, posted 07-11-2005 5:34 PM wmscott has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by wmscott, posted 07-13-2005 8:24 PM Rahvin has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 49 of 300 (223248)
07-11-2005 8:14 PM


What is peace?
I think we need to define "peace." Does it mean not worrying? I don't think there are very many people in the world who never worry.
I don't think there is any such thing as "inner peace."

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 50 of 300 (223668)
07-13-2005 8:09 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Firebird
07-11-2005 6:11 PM


Ask her yourself and find out.
Dear Firebird;
My sister-in-law is a JW; the only one in the family. Are you seriously suggesting that she has this True (since you capitalised it) inner peace, believing that an imminent Armageddon will bring eternal death to her husband, children and parents?
Ask her yourself and find out, besides you really should spend some time with your brother and his wife. A Witness always keeps the door of hope open, hopefully her husband, children and parents will listen before it is too late. Our peace from God enables us to cope with difficult situations and we always trust God to be merciful and to be a perfect judge of what is in a person's heart. We also do not decide who will or will not survive Armageddon, that is for God to decide, we can't say one way or the other whether a specific non-Witness (or Witness for that matter) will survive Armageddon. Also we are not just concerned about our just our own family, we are concerned about everyone, it is our endeavor to preach the Good News of the Kingdom to everyone so that everyone has the opportunity of choosing to serve God. But we also realize that since Jesus said (Matthew 7:13-14) "Go in through the narrow gate; because broad and spacious is the road leading off into destruction, and many are the ones going in through it; whereas narrow is the gate and cramped the road leading off into life, and few are the ones finding it." most people will reject God and die at Armageddon. We still have True inner peace just like Noah did when he knew what was coming upon the world of his day. We know God is righteous and have total trust in his judgement, only those who should die at Armageddon, will die. We don't fear Armageddon, we look forward to it. (Luke 21:9-28) "For these things must occur first, but the end does not [occur] immediately . . . But as these things start to occur, raise yourselves erect and lift YOUR heads up, because YOUR deliverance is getting near." Armageddon is not just the destruction of the wicked, it is the deliverance of the righteous. It is a wonderful hope, the coming establishment of the Messianic Kingdom on earth.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Firebird, posted 07-11-2005 6:11 PM Firebird has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Firebird, posted 07-13-2005 11:27 PM wmscott has replied

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 51 of 300 (223670)
07-13-2005 8:13 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by crashfrog
07-11-2005 6:23 PM


Re: Your peace is one of death, mine is of hope,
Dear Crashfrog;
[The only religion today that really follows the Bible is Jehovah's Witnesses.]- I'm sorry, but you're mistaken.
Prove it. I have never found another religion that truly follows the Bible, if you know of one, I would really like to hear about.
Since I have true inner peace, and it did not come from God, you must be mistaken.
I don't think you have ever had true inner peace, so you don't have anything to compare yours with and as a result don't know what you are talking about. Read my post to Rahvin on the measure of True inner peace, and tell me that is the kind of peace that you have.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by crashfrog, posted 07-11-2005 6:23 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by crashfrog, posted 07-13-2005 9:27 PM wmscott has replied

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 52 of 300 (223674)
07-13-2005 8:21 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Rahvin
07-11-2005 6:20 PM


The measure of True inner peace
Dear Rahvin;
But to say that "hope of the resurrection" is the ONLY source of comfort and hope is horribly bigoted and arrogant. A Hindu would draw comfort and hope from the belief that their child will be reincarnated, perhaps into a better life. And it is still valid to say that an atheist could take pride in the way they raised their child, and be at peace with the life their child was able to lead. I'm not saying that it doesn't hurt like hell, and I'm not saying that it ever goes away. I am saying that a person can remain strong and retain a positive outlook on life and a sense of inner peace despite that pain. . . . Atheists lose children just as often as Christians, it hits them just as hard, and I doubt you can show that every one of them loses their sense of inner peace any more than a Christian does.
The hope of the resurrection is the only hope of seeing your dead loved one again, reincarnation doesn't offer that hope. Reincarnation is a poor sort of hope anyway, since even if there was any truth in it, the person has no memory of their past life, the mind is wiped clean. If that happened, the person is gone, reincarnation of a vegetable, would be the result. For without what is in our minds that makes us who we are, we would be nothing, brain dead. The hope of the resurrection is the only real hope, non-Christian religions have nothing in comparison and their explanations for evil and other things fall just as short. Most importantly of course, is that fact that man made religions have make believe hope, since it isn't from Jehovah God.
Yes an atheist could at least take pride about having raised their child, but they have no hope at all, just bleak acceptance. Perhaps some atheists do manage to maintain a positive outlook on life after such a lost, but they have to do it without any hope. Those who do, are a testimony to their personal strength, not to the strength of the philosophy of atheism. There is no comfort or real inner peace (the kind built on hope) in atheism. As a group, I would expect that those who have real faith in the resurrection cope far better then a group of atheists. I have seen a very marked difference between Jehovah's Witnesses everyone else in coping with the lost of a loved one in death, ours is a measured grief, like the child has been whisked away to a far country without our consent, but we know he will return to us in time. While for others, the grief is total.
I have personally known several atheists who are more moral, more caring, more genuine, more emotionally stable, and mentally stronger than nearly all of the Christians I have known. My experiences would tend to disprove your assumption that all atheists are hopeless and dead inside.
And what hope does an atheist have in the face of death? If they have no hope, then they are hopeless, if they have accepted death then they are in a way already dead inside.
Most christians are such in name only as you know already, hypocrites are never at peace, and since most christian religions follow the word of man rather than the Word of God, they are a poor example anyway.
Many people have read the Bible and concluded that it did NOT, in fact, provide satisfactory answers. To say that the Bible is the ONLY source of satisfactory answers is not only foolhardy, but bigoted against other religions beyond belief.
Reading something is not a guarantee of comprehending it. (Acts 8:30-31)" "Do you actually know what you are reading?" He said: "Really, how could I ever do so, unless someone guided me?"" It takes a thorough study of the Bible to find the answers to these questions, a person just reading it on their own, would be unlikely to the answers on their own. Which is why Jehovah's Witnesses offer to study the Bible free of charge with anyone who would like find them. We also offer Bible study books free to people who would like to read them and learn these things. So the fact that some have looked into the Bible and not found any answers doesn't mean that they are not there. If you want to know what they are, like why does god permit wickedness?; I would be happy to show it to you from the Bible. And in actually going door to door, and talking to people of other religions, I can tell you that they do not have satisfying answers to these questions.
We had THOUSANDS OF YEARS under the philosophies of religion and achieved NOTHING. Please note the Dark Ages, a period in which the Catholic Church enforced a Theocracy across all of Europe. Ever hear of the Inquisition? Yes, religion worked very well for us there. Or how about Afghanistan? The depravities of the Taliban were and still are done in the name of faith. Secular societies have only recently arisen, and in that time we have sent probes to the outer regions of the solar system, cured countless diseases, and improved the quality of life for BILLIONS of human beings. I'd say the "philosophies of men" have held up pretty well through some of the darkest periods of history, and advanced the entire human species.
We had THOUSANDS OF YEARS under the philosophies of false religion. Jesus warned, (Matthew 7:15-20) "Be on the watch for the false prophets that come to YOU in sheep's covering, but inside they are ravenous wolves. By their fruits YOU will recognize them. Never do people gather grapes from thorns or figs from thistles, do they? Likewise every good tree produces fine fruit, but every rotten tree produces worthless fruit; a good tree cannot bear worthless fruit, neither can a rotten tree produce fine fruit. Every tree not producing fine fruit gets cut down and thrown into the fire. Really, then, by their fruits YOU will recognize those [men]." when a religion does evil things, it shows itself to be evil. Christ said of such people, (Matthew 7:22-23) "Many will say to me in that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and expel demons in your name, and perform many powerful works in your name?' And yet then I will confess to them: I never knew YOU! Get away from me, YOU workers of lawlessness." all religions that produce bad fruit are not true followers of Christ. It is easy to spot these false religions by their long histories of evil deeds and by the fact that what they teach is in conflict with what Jesus taught. Jesus taught his followers to be no part of the world, to be peaceable towards all men, loving them as they would love themselves.
The scientific advancement of our day is very impressive, but what good is it without moral advancement? We make better medicines, but we make better weapons too. I am all in favor of science, but it is only a tool, a way of finding better ways of doing things. It doesn't give us morals to live by or answer the questions that are in our heart, because science is about how, not why.
If you wish to tout secular societies, why not consider the former USSR? Surely as an atheistic society it was the best of all countries in which to live. (LOL)
You're arguing as if you had already proven that the strongest sense of peace comes only from God. Then you say that only God can say for sure — if we mere humans can't possibly know, then why ask the question to other mere humans?. . . But you have failed to prove that an Atheist or person of a non-Judeo-Christian faith cannot have a sense of inner peace that is just as strong as the peace that can be attained through faith in God. Please provide evidence for your argument. . . . If you would like to debate whether Atheists and non-Judeo-Christians can have a sense of inner peace just as strong as the peace Judeao-Christians draw from their faith in God, then please provide evidence to back up your claims.
As I mentioned before, it is hard to measure some one's inner peace, and how do you tell if his inner peace is unbreakable? The answer of course is simple, you see if can be broken. Now I am claiming that Jehovah God, the God of the Bible and the God of Jesus (John 20:17) and Abraham, gives his true followers an unbreakable inner peace. I am also claiming that only Jehovah's Witnesses are true follows of Jehovah God and his son Christ Jesus, and they are the only ones who have been given the unbreakable peace from God.
To test this assertion, one would need to round up a large number of Jehovah's Witnesses and subject them years of imprisonment with harsh treatment, torture, starvation and surround them with death and the threat of death. You would also set it up, so that all they have to do is sign a paper renouncing their faith, and they can walk out the door free. You would also show them you mean business by executing some of those who have refused to sign. Maximum phycological pressure would be applied, if our inner peace is truly unbreakable, you would expect the majority or at least a substantial percentage to be able to hold on to their inner peace as demonstrated by their keeping their faith by refusing to renounce it despite all hardship.
As evil and demonic as this thought experiment sounds, it has all ready been done, in Germany durning the second world war. Jehovah's Witnesses obeying God first, and man second, refused to break God's laws and serve in Hitler's armies or to give any support to the evil actions of the Nazi political party and remained neutral. The Nazi's viewed Jehovah's Witnesses as a direct idealogical threat and did everything in their power to root them out and destroy them. They didn't want to just kill them, they wanted to destroy them ideologically, they needed to discredit them by breaking them and making them renounce their faith. The full power of the Nazi war machine was turned on a small religious group who preached peace and merely wanted to be left alone. Would the True inner peace from God that Jehovah's Witnesses have received, fail? Here is what happened.
their faith held firm and there were few who were willing to sign [169] the paper denying the movement and thus buying their freedom. Theological principles were adhered to; Witnesses remained 'neutrals, they were honest and completely trustworthy and as such, ironically, often found themselves employed as servants of the S.S. One S.S. officer commented that only a Jehovah's Witness could be trusted to shave his master with a cut throat razor without wielding the razor to most violent ends.
Against all odds, Witnesses in the camps met and prayed together, produced literature and made converts. Sustained by their fellowship, and, unlike many other prisoners, well aware of the reasons why such places existed and why they should suffer thus, Witnesses proved a small but memorable band of prisoners, marked by the violet triangle and noted for their courage and their convictions.
In the camps they experienced the ultimate test of their faith, as 'witnesses' to Jehovah. It was adherence to their faith that kept many of them in camps, away from their families, suffering the privation and bestial conditions designed to break their spirit and reveal the strength and inevitability of the National Socialist cause in the face of all opposition. It was here, if anywhere, that survival strategies which put the keeping of the faith before the safety or even life of an adherent, were to meet their severest test. It is clear that the Witnesses found their principles stayed firm, their world-view confirmed rather than perverted, and their personal survival, in the face of God's plan, irrelevant. Some 10,000 were imprisoned, and together they received sentences totalling 20,000 years. One out of every two German Witnesses was imprisoned, one in four lost their lives. Nevertheless the work continued. The details of daily life in the concentration [170] camps illustrates yet again the real basis of the conflict between the Nazis and these sectarians. Witnesses were unswerving, refusing compromise, unrepentant and totally convinced that the Nazi system was doomed. Not even the fact that they made good and trustworthy servants could save them from the implications of these views. Mocked, sometimes by other prisoners as well as the guards, they maintained their faith, supported by the complex underground network set up within the camps, and even, on occasions, between different camps.
Bruno Bettleheim, in his study of the camps claims that according to classic psychoanalytical theory the Witnesses should have been the first to fall apart under stress, losing their delusions and certainties amidst the horrors of their new life. In fact, as Bettleheim and others have noted, they survived remarkably well, appearing protected against the camp experiences that broke other prisoners. Witnesses indeed had special aids to survival lacking to all other groups with the exception of the dedicated and convinced Communists. They had a supportive network, a conviction of being right, of having had their experiences of suffering foretold and, most of all, the sense of belonging to a chosen and esoteric group with its own world-view. This world-view could be held intact amidst the brutal realities of camp life and thus Witnesses had what later analysers of survival in camps have identified as essential, an ability to interpret and make sense of what they saw around them and what they suffered themselves. What they experienced had the effect of reinforcing their views, whereas for ethers it had the totally destructive and disorientating effect of throwing into question all they had ever learnt or believed about themselves and life. The Witness' view of the meaning of his life was held intact in the middle of the violence, humiliation and reversion to [171] animal behaviour which is known to have had such terrible effects on others. The Witness who remained alive, even if he suffered, was in God's hands. The Witness who died knew that there was a purpose in his death which became not empty and meaningless, but a martyrdom.
Witnesses in the camps behaved, as far as they were able, as model prisoners, accepting orders and willingly obeying authority. In this they were criticised by other inmates, but in this lay a measure of their survival. They remained detached, as obedient in the world of the camps as in outside society. They were God's people and nothing could change that.
Members of this self contained, believing group were impervious to many of the spiritual, moral and psychological crises experienced by other prisoners, although they were by no means spared their share of physical and emotional suffering. Witnesses, on the whole, unless they were tortured to the stage beyond which human judgement fails, were not confused, were never vacillating. They knew what was happening to them and they believed they knew why it was happening; death held no fear. Their uncompromising and unflinching attitude had brought them into the camps but it was this that sustained them, once there. The rigidity of their belief, their self-contained world-view explains an emotional and psychological strength which later scholars have found surprising in a group from a generally low socio-economic and educational background. Prisoners from this kind of background were found normally to suffer great disorientation in prisons and camps, since they wore unable to articulate their feelings or to make any intellectual sense of their situation. Witnesses were not like that, they came Out of the camps still seeking converts, handing round cards to their newly released and confused fellow prisoners. The cards gave a simple hope: 'There is [172] a God; there is a purpose to all of this'. They continued to make converts.
The Nazi State and the New Religions: Five Case Studies in Non-Conformity: A Triumph of the Will: The Jehovah's Witnesses
The book Crystal Night: 9-10 November 1938, reports that 300-400 Witness inmates in Buchenwald shared their bread rations with some of the 2,250 Jews brought to the camp in 1938. One Buchenwald survivor told how Witnesses gave their bread to Jewish prisoners and went without food themselves for up to four days.
Bruno Bettelheim observed that the Witnesses "were the only group of prisoners who never abused or mistreated other prisoners" and were "exemplary comrades, helpful, correct, dependable." The Witnesses were known for sharing their Bible message with other prisoners. "Though the gentile prisoners were forbidden to talk to us," said a Jewish woman in Lichtenburg, "these women never observed this regulation. They prayed for us as if we belonged to their family, and begged us to hold out." BBC reporter Bjrn Hallstrom said that in Buchenwald, Witnesses were punished for eight days because they "had not avoided the forbidden paths between the Jewish blocks."
Frustrated by the Witnesses' persistent resistance, the SS regularly announced in Sachsenhausen that prisoners caught talking to Witnesses would receive 25 strokes. Survivor Max Liebster recalls that the SS there isolated the Witnesses and declared their barracks off limits to other prisoners. In Melk, Polish survivor Joseph Kempler says he saw "a camp within a camp" and was told that the SS kept the "purple triangles" in it, dangerous prisoners because they taught people the Bible.
Capitulation, not annihilation, seems to have been the Nazi goal for the Witnesses, despite the fact that Hitler had declared about them in 1934, "This brood will be exterminated!" The Gestapo and SS applied the usual torture methods, and in the process hundreds of Witnesses died. But a clue as to the Nazi aim of breaking Witness resolve is found in a remarkable document offered repeatedly to Witness prisoners a renunciation of their faith and a pledge of loyalty to the fatherland. In exchange for a signature, a Witness could walk away free from camp or prison. Dr. Detlef Garbe, author of an exhaustive volume on the Witnesses, estimates that of the 10,000 Witnesses imprisoned during the Nazi period, there were only a few dozen cases of individuals who signed the so-called Declaration and gained release.
As an intimidation tactic, the SS staged several showcase executions. Heinrich Himmler ordered August Dickmann, a 29-year-old German Witness, shot by firing squad at Sachsenhausen on September 15, 1939. The New York Times named Dickmann as the first conscientious objector of the war to be executed by the Nazis. The entire camp, including Dickmann's brother Heinrich and about 400 other Witnesses, had to watch. The commandant threatened the Witness inmates with a similar fate unless they signed the Declaration. Not one Witness yielded, but the threat was not carried out.
In Ravensbruck, 400 Witness women refused to sew ammunition pockets. Brutal punishment resulted. Yet fellow prisoner Genevieve de Gaulle, niece of Charles de Gaulle, said of the Witnesses: "Ultimately, these women, who appeared to be so weak and worn out, were stronger than the SS. . . . It was their willpower that no one could beat."
Eugen Kogon's famous work The Theory and Practice of Hell states, "One cannot escape the impression that, psychologically speaking, the SS was never quite equal to the challenge offered them by Jehovah's Witnesses."
The Witnesses, who saw themselves as part of the universal struggle of good against evil, sought to conquer the scourge of Nazism in accord with the principles of their faith. For them, says James Pellechia, producer of an award-winning documentary on the Witness experience, it was "a battle for the right to worship their God, a battle to love their neighbor, and a battle to tell the truth."
Hannah, a children's librarian now living in New Jersey, U.S.A., feels that her chance encounter with the Witnesses helped her to cope with the terrors her family faced before they finally escaped Nazi Germany. "It allowed me to be centered in this situation by having seen and been told not to worry, how there are good people who are there to help," she says. "It impacted on me my whole life."
Purple Triangles: A Story of Spiritual Resistance
Himmler often used the "fanatical faith" of Jehovah's Witnesses as an example to his own SS troops. In his view, SS men had to have the same "unshakable faith" in the National Socialist ideal and in Adolf Hitler that the Witnesses had in Jehovah.
Jehovah’s Witnesses - Holocaust Teacher Resource Center
A few more relevant links.
Holocaust Encyclopedia | United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
Jehovah's Witnesses and the Holocaust introduction
http://www.watchtower.org/library/w/1998/6/1/article_01.htm VA JOSEFSSON
http://www.watchtower.org/library/w/2003/3/1/article_02.htm They Triumphed
Over Persecution
After years of trying to break Jehovah's Witnesses, even someone like Himmler saw that we have an unshakable or unbreakable faith. The inner peace and faith of the vast majority of Jehovah's Witnesses remained intact and unbroken in harmony with what Paul stated at Romans 8:35-39. "Who will separate us from the love of the Christ? Will tribulation or distress or persecution or hunger or nakedness or danger or sword? Just as it is written: "For your sake we are being put to death all day long, we have been accounted as sheep for slaughtering." To the contrary, in all these things we are coming off completely victorious through him that loved us. For I am convinced that neither death nor life nor angels nor governments nor things now here nor things to come nor powers nor height nor depth nor any other creation will be able to separate us from God's love that is in Christ Jesus our Lord."
As inspiring as the courageous moral stand taken by Jehovah's Witnesses against the Nazis was, they were alone. All other religious organizations present in Germany at the time, compromised with the Nazis and supported them. Rather than taking the moral stand they should have, they curried favor with Nazis and actively supported them, even fighting and dying in support of the Nazi government.
If you would like to debate whether Atheists and non-Judeo-Christians can have a sense of inner peace just as strong as the peace Judeao-Christians draw from their faith in God, then please provide evidence to back up your claims.
I just have and the evidence is clear that the True followers of Jesus Christ, Jehovah's Witnesses, have an unbreakable inner peace and that no one else has anything like it. In the camps they were a solitary island of peace, surrounded by a raging storm of violence and death. There wasn't any other place of peace, they were alone in the storm.
I wish I could say that persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses was fortunately ancient history, but it is not and has continued right down to today. Jehovah's Witnesses still maintain the same stand today as they did then, and remain the only island of real peace.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Rahvin, posted 07-11-2005 6:20 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by Rahvin, posted 07-14-2005 1:35 PM wmscott has replied

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 53 of 300 (223675)
07-13-2005 8:24 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Rahvin
07-11-2005 7:01 PM


Re: Reality-the quality or state of being real.
Dear Rahvin;
To say that your religion's interpretation is the only possible correct one without anything to back it up is awfully arrogant.
I use the whole Bible back up my claim, I know that doesn't cut any ice with an atheist, but with christians it is the final authority. Everything Jehovah's Witnesses believe is directly supported by scripture. While there are many interpretations there is only one right one, and the way to tell which one is right is that is will agree with the rest of the Bible and no other verses will contradict the correct interpretation.
No, it's not. Norse mythology contains prophesies that were fulfilled in various myths. That doesn't prove that they happened! A book CANNOT prove itself! Only EVIDENCE can prove or disprove anything.
For many of the Bible prophecies we have independent historical confirmation of the fulfillment taking place, and that the prophecy was written long in advance. Just one of the many of these is by itself enough to prove God's existence and there are many. You really should consider the evidence, there is enough to disprove atheism a hundred times over. If you only read what agrees with your beliefs, you learn very little and may never see any errors because you are only looking at it from one point of view.
Even in your silly example of The Wheel of Time books, there is one author behind the books, setting everything up so it all works out. Who is doing that for the Bible?
Yes we are wandering off topic a bit, I may start another topic on this later when this one is done and I have time for it. But if you want to talk now, there is always e-mail.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Rahvin, posted 07-11-2005 7:01 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by CK, posted 07-14-2005 4:53 AM wmscott has not replied
 Message 60 by Rahvin, posted 07-14-2005 2:03 PM wmscott has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 54 of 300 (223683)
07-13-2005 9:27 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by wmscott
07-13-2005 8:13 PM


Prove it. I have never found another religion that truly follows the Bible, if you know of one, I would really like to hear about.
You misunderstand my position. The Jehovah's Witnesses don't follow the Bible. Of course they say they do, but I invite you to prove that they do.
I don't think you have ever had true inner peace, so you don't have anything to compare yours with and as a result don't know what you are talking about.
I'm absolutely certain of the exact same thing about you. By all means, prove me wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by wmscott, posted 07-13-2005 8:13 PM wmscott has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by wmscott, posted 07-16-2005 7:04 AM crashfrog has replied

Firebird
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 300 (223690)
07-13-2005 11:27 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by wmscott
07-13-2005 8:09 PM


I was asking you
Ask her yourself and find out
It hasn’t come up, because my sister-in-law, in all our regular discussion and correspondence, has never claimed to have more or better inner peace than anyone else.
besides you really should spend some time with your brother and his wife
You have some information as a basis for your inference that I don’t?
We still have True inner peace just like Noah did when he knew what was coming upon the world of his day. We know God is righteous and have total trust in his judgement, only those who should die at Armageddon, will die. We don't fear Armageddon, we look forward to it
OK, that’s your belief.
Since you responded to my question, I’ll reply to your OP, which is perhaps what I should have done in the first place. I am inclined to agree with Robinrohan, that there may be no such thing as True inner peace. My own experience is that in the times I’ve been most in turmoil, I learned the most and grew the most. And I cannot equate any kind of inner peace with the hope of resurrection, since as you have said, it is hope only, not assurance! If I understand you correctly, this inner peace is based on whatever happens, God is in control and there will be a happy ending. I cannot see how this would not apply to many other Christians and non-Christians.
From your post to Rahvin
As a group, I would expect that those who have real faith in the resurrection cope far better then a group of atheists. I have seen a very marked difference between Jehovah's Witnesses everyone else in coping with the lost of a loved one in death, ours is a measured grief, like the child has been whisked away to a far country without our consent, but we know he will return to us in time. While for others, the grief is total.
Your evidence of believers in your religion coping better than all others appears to be anecdotal. Are there any statistical comparisons that support your position, for instance, of comparative mental health, or self-image?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by wmscott, posted 07-13-2005 8:09 PM wmscott has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by NosyNed, posted 07-14-2005 10:16 AM Firebird has replied
 Message 70 by wmscott, posted 07-16-2005 7:06 AM Firebird has replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 56 of 300 (223701)
07-14-2005 4:53 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by wmscott
07-13-2005 8:24 PM


Re: Reality-the quality or state of being real.
quote:
For many of the Bible prophecies we have independent historical confirmation of the fulfillment taking place,
Like the generation who would see the end of the world? How's that one going? still altering the message every so often?
Your cult is no different from any of the others.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by wmscott, posted 07-13-2005 8:24 PM wmscott has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by Brian, posted 07-14-2005 2:54 PM CK has not replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 57 of 300 (223720)
07-14-2005 10:16 AM
Reply to: Message 55 by Firebird
07-13-2005 11:27 PM


religious inner peace
Your evidence of believers in your religion coping better than all others appears to be anecdotal. Are there any statistical comparisons that support your position, for instance, of comparative mental health, or self-image?
This isn't going to help a lot but I read about some studies a few months ago supporting this. Those with religious belief are, it seems, "happier" than those without.
I think it was an article in "New Scientist".
I remember little about it beyond that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Firebird, posted 07-13-2005 11:27 PM Firebird has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by Rahvin, posted 07-14-2005 2:10 PM NosyNed has not replied
 Message 66 by Firebird, posted 07-14-2005 11:20 PM NosyNed has not replied

Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4046
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 58 of 300 (223744)
07-14-2005 1:35 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by wmscott
07-13-2005 8:21 PM


Re: The measure of True inner peace
wmscott, you assume much.
Reading something is not a guarantee of comprehending it. (Acts 8:30-31)" "Do you actually know what you are reading?" He said: "Really, how could I ever do so, unless someone guided me?"" It takes a thorough study of the Bible to find the answers to these questions, a person just reading it on their own, would be unlikely to the answers on their own. Which is why Jehovah's Witnesses offer to study the Bible free of charge with anyone who would like find them. We also offer Bible study books free to people who would like to read them and learn these things. So the fact that some have looked into the Bible and not found any answers doesn't mean that they are not there. If you want to know what they are, like why does god permit wickedness?; I would be happy to show it to you from the Bible. And in actually going door to door, and talking to people of other religions, I can tell you that they do not have satisfying answers to these questions.
Apparently you don’t believe I, or anyone, can read a book and understand it without being told what to believe by another person. A Jehovah’s Witness, I assume. Prefer not to have someone tell me what I believe. I can decide what I believe in by myself, thank you very much. And I have found answers in the Bible, quite a few of them. I doubt they are remotely close to the same answers you have found, but that doesn’t mean my interpretation is wrong. I am just as entitled to it as you are to yours.
We had THOUSANDS OF YEARS under the philosophies of false religion. Jesus warned, (Matthew 7:15-20) "Be on the watch for the false prophets that come to YOU in sheep's covering, but inside they are ravenous wolves. By their fruits YOU will recognize them. Never do people gather grapes from thorns or figs from thistles, do they? Likewise every good tree produces fine fruit, but every rotten tree produces worthless fruit; a good tree cannot bear worthless fruit, neither can a rotten tree produce fine fruit. Every tree not producing fine fruit gets cut down and thrown into the fire. Really, then, by their fruits YOU will recognize those [men]." when a religion does evil things, it shows itself to be evil. Christ said of such people, (Matthew 7:22-23) "Many will say to me in that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and expel demons in your name, and perform many powerful works in your name?' And yet then I will confess to them: I never knew YOU! Get away from me, YOU workers of lawlessness." all religions that produce bad fruit are not true followers of Christ. It is easy to spot these false religions by their long histories of evil deeds and by the fact that what they teach is in conflict with what Jesus taught. Jesus taught his followers to be no part of the world, to be peaceable towards all men, loving them as they would love themselves.
First off, I don’t care which religion is the right one or not as far as Theocracies go. The fact is, if you operate under the laws of a given religion, all other religions are persecuted. The Catholic Church surely proved that with the Inquisition and the Crusades. The Taliban surely proved that with their strict interpretation and enforcement of Islam in Afghanistan. Even if we assume for the sake of argument that Jehovah’s Witnesses are correct, they would have no right to enforce their beliefs on people who believe differently. Secular society is the ONLY way to ensure that each religion’s rights are protected without infringing on the rights of others.
Taking the bearing good fruit analogy, fundamental Christians (including Jehovah’s Witnesses) hope and pray for the Apocalypse, and the DEATHS OF BILLIONS OF PEOPLE! Not only that, you hope for the billions who die to be sent to eternal torment in Hell! You preach fear, fear of eternal torment to gain believers, rather than teaching people to do what is good and right for its own sake. You preach bigotry and persecution of any who do not follow your beliefs, being only nice enough to gain new converts. I don’t call any of that good fruit. I think that fails the love thy neighbor test. You know, by praying for his death and eternal torment and all.
The scientific advancement of our day is very impressive, but what good is it without moral advancement? We make better medicines, but we make better weapons too. I am all in favor of science, but it is only a tool, a way of finding better ways of doing things. It doesn't give us morals to live by or answer the questions that are in our heart, because science is about how, not why.
You would be surprised. You are correct that science only answers how with no regard to why (you assume that there IS a why, whereas science does not. There may be a great reason, but that’s not science’s job, that’s not what science is). Logic, however, DOES provide an excellent moral guide. Logic is not as cold and merciless as is shown in entertainment. Love thy neighbor as you love yourself is actually a moral guide that everyone, atheist or otherwise, can believe in, and non-Christians don’t need the Bible to tell them about it. I think that moral advancement comes from refining and revising outdated moral codes in favor of morality that makes sense. Non-Christians are perfectly capable of developing a good moral code just as strong and more sensible than the code put down in the Bible. Rules about sexuality and diet are irrelevant morally — breaking them hurts no one, and so they are not immoral. Theft, murder, rape, torture, etc. all have victims. People and/or society as a whole are adversely affected by them, and therefore they are immoral. You see? Science and logic just advanced morality past the outdated static rules set forth in the Bible.
If you wish to tout secular societies, why not consider the former USSR? Surely as an atheistic society it was the best of all countries in which to live. (LOL)
LOL indeed. The USSR was not the type of secular society I am speaking about. The USSR actively suppressed religion and encouraged atheism. This is no different and just as harmful as suppressing atheism and encouraging a specific brand of Christianity. The USSR failed as a society (in terms of being the best of all countries in which to live) because it operated from a position of fear and power, much like fundamental fire-and-brimstone Christians. Your witty retort is about as valid as if I were to use David Koresh as proof that all Christians are evil.
As I mentioned before, it is hard to measure some one's inner peace, and how do you tell if his inner peace is unbreakable? The answer of course is simple, you see if can be broken. Now I am claiming that Jehovah God, the God of the Bible and the God of Jesus (John 20:17) and Abraham, gives his true followers an unbreakable inner peace. I am also claiming that only Jehovah's Witnesses are true follows of Jehovah God and his son Christ Jesus, and they are the only ones who have been given the unbreakable peace from God.
Still spouting bigotry and arrogance, I see. Your position is impossible to test by your definitions. If a Christian (or Jehovah’s Witness) were to break, you would say they were not a true believer. If the Christian remains strong, you would claim it to be a gift of peace from God without further examination. The same results, of course, can be obtained from various cults.
As evil and demonic as this thought experiment sounds, it has all ready been done, in Germany durning the second world war. Jehovah's Witnesses obeying God first, and man second, refused to break God's laws and serve in Hitler's armies or to give any support to the evil actions of the Nazi political party and remained neutral. The Nazi's viewed Jehovah's Witnesses as a direct idealogical threat and did everything in their power to root them out and destroy them. They didn't want to just kill them, they wanted to destroy them ideologically, they needed to discredit them by breaking them and making them renounce their faith. The full power of the Nazi war machine was turned on a small religious group who preached peace and merely wanted to be left alone. Would the True inner peace from God that Jehovah's Witnesses have received, fail? Here is what happened.
I don’t want to quote your entire story here, as it would make a long reply even longer. The story you post is quite admirable, but it doesn’t prove your point. It proves that many Jehovah’s Witnesses remained strong in their beliefs and chose concentration camps rather than betrayal of what they believed in. It does NOT prove that under the same circumstances, an Atheist or person of another religion would break by default. Can you offer evidence of this? Your claim requires that anyone NOT a Jehovah’s Witness would break under similar circumstances, every time.
I refer you to these statistics:
Estimates of Non-Combatant Lives Lost During the Holocaust
Mentally/Physically Disabled 70,000- 250,000
Homosexuals Tens of thousands
Spanish Republicans Tens of thousands
Jehovah's Witnesses 2,500 - 5,000
Link
All other religious organizations present in Germany at the time, compromised with the Nazis and supported them. Rather than taking the moral stand they should have, they curried favor with Nazis and actively supported them, even fighting and dying in support of the Nazi government.
Prove that all other religious organizations cooperated with the Nazis. Prove that all of their practitioners also failed to take a moral stand. Prove that those who DID dissent were not sent to the concentration camps, and/or that they eventually broke down and renounced their faith. You make bold claims, wmscott, but I have yet to see any EVIDENCE!
I just have and the evidence is clear that the True followers of Jesus Christ, Jehovah's Witnesses, have an unbreakable inner peace and that no one else has anything like it. In the camps they were a solitary island of peace, surrounded by a raging storm of violence and death. There wasn't any other place of peace, they were alone in the storm.
Ha! You most certainly have NOT provided evidence. You have proven that many Jehovah’s Witnesses had a sense of inner peace that was not broken by their experience in the Holocaust. Certainly this reflects well on those individuals, but you have NOT provided evidence that NON-Witnesses cannot have a sense of peace just as strong and just as unbreakable. All you have done is provided rhetoric and anecdotal evidence, which is worthless.
Please also note that if God grants this unshakeable faith and peace to Witnesses, there should be NO de-conversions. This is not the case. You will of course say that these people must not have been true Jehovah’s Witnesses.
I’ve said it multiple times already. PROVE THAT NON-JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES CANNOT HAVE A SENSE OF PEACE JUST AS STRONG.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by wmscott, posted 07-13-2005 8:21 PM wmscott has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by NosyNed, posted 07-14-2005 1:39 PM Rahvin has replied
 Message 71 by wmscott, posted 07-16-2005 7:12 AM Rahvin has replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 59 of 300 (223745)
07-14-2005 1:39 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by Rahvin
07-14-2005 1:35 PM


all Christians evil? No! Just some.
Your witty retort is about as valid as if I were to use David Koresh as proof that all Christians are evil.
Knowing someone who choose to leave the JW's I know that they represent a form of evil too. To destroy a family is surely not a Christian thing but the JW's will do it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Rahvin, posted 07-14-2005 1:35 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by Rahvin, posted 07-14-2005 2:20 PM NosyNed has not replied
 Message 72 by wmscott, posted 07-16-2005 7:14 AM NosyNed has not replied

Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4046
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 60 of 300 (223758)
07-14-2005 2:03 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by wmscott
07-13-2005 8:24 PM


Re: Reality-the quality or state of being real.
I use the whole Bible back up my claim, I know that doesn't cut any ice with an atheist, but with christians it is the final authority. Everything Jehovah's Witnesses believe is directly supported by scripture. While there are many interpretations there is only one right one, and the way to tell which one is right is that is will agree with the rest of the Bible and no other verses will contradict the correct interpretation.
The Bible contradicts itself all the time.
quote:
Ex.20:14, Dt.5:18
Thou shalt not commit adultery
vs.
Hos.1:2
"And the Lord said to Hosea, Go, take unto thee a wife of whoredoms...."
Hos.3:1
"Then said the Lord unto me, God yet, love a woman beloved of her friend, yet an adulteress."
Num.6:3
"He shall separate himself from wine and strong drink, and shall drink no vinegar of wine, or vinegar of strong drink, neither shall he drink any liquor of grapes, nor eat moist grapes, or dried."
Pr.20:1
"Wine is a mocker, strong drink is raging: and whosoever is deceived thereby is not wise."
Pr.23:20-21
"Be not among winebibbers.... For the drunkard and the glutton shall come to poverty."
Vs
Jg.9:13
"Wine, which cheereth God and man."
Ps.104:15
"Wine that maketh glad the heart of man."
Pr.31:6-9
"Give strong drink unto him that is ready to perish, and wine unto those that be of heavy hearts. Let him drink, and forget his poverty, and remember his misery no more."
Song of Solomon 5:1
"I have drunk my wine.... O friends; drink, yea, drink abundantly."
Jn.2:3-10
"And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine. ... His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it. ... Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim. And he saith unto them, Draw out now, and bear unto the governor of the feast. And they bare it. When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine ... the governor of the feast called the bridegroom, And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now."
Is Adultery wrong? Because God apparently ordered people to commit it occasionally. I drinking wrong? Because the Bible says not to drink wine, but then says wine pleases God and men, and Jesus Himself turned water into wine!
The Bible is FILLED with contradictions. There is NO WAY to re-interpret those quotes to show which view is correct — the Bible straight out literally contradicts itself.
The right interpretation of the Bible is highly subjective. This is part of the reason we have so many different denominations of Christianity. Claiming that your position is right because it is supported by scripture is not only a logical fallacy (appeal to authority), but is ALSO so highly subject to interpretation that one can prove that the Bible supports or condemns just about anything.
I still see no proof that non-Jehovah’s Witnesses can not feel a sense of inner peace just as strong as Witnesses feel.
For many of the Bible prophecies we have independent historical confirmation of the fulfillment taking place, and that the prophecy was written long in advance. Just one of the many of these is by itself enough to prove God's existence and there are many. You really should consider the evidence, there is enough to disprove atheism a hundred times over. If you only read what agrees with your beliefs, you learn very little and may never see any errors because you are only looking at it from one point of view.
Even in your silly example of The Wheel of Time books, there is one author behind the books, setting everything up so it all works out. Who is doing that for the Bible?
Show evidence of these historical confirmations.
As for the WoT analogy, it was an example only insofar as to show that a source cannot prove its own authenticity. Nothing more. You are still guilty of the appeal to authority logical fallacy. You argue that a thing is so because the Bible says so! That is not a debate, that is religious rhetoric. Provide evidence and let your argument rest on its own validity.
One more time:
SHOW EVIDENCE THAT NON-JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES CAN NOT HAVE A SENSE OF PEACE JUST AS STRONG AS THAT FELT BY JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by wmscott, posted 07-13-2005 8:24 PM wmscott has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by wmscott, posted 07-16-2005 7:16 AM Rahvin has replied
 Message 103 by Watson75, posted 07-28-2005 5:04 AM Rahvin has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024