Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 52 (9179 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Post Volume: Total: 918,175 Year: 5,432/9,624 Month: 457/323 Week: 97/204 Day: 13/26 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Thread Reopen Requests 2
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 58 of 124 (567479)
07-01-2010 10:30 AM


God damnit moose
Hello
This thread lasted less than 12 hours...
I'd like to get to know this guy a little better. Its in the Coffee House. What's the big deal if its a little unfocused?
I wrote up my reply in notepad only to find that its alread been Moosed.
Can you re-open it so I can at least post what I've already typed up. I even have links to other members and threads for the newbie to check out.

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Adminnemooseus, posted 07-01-2010 12:51 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 60 of 124 (567521)
07-01-2010 12:52 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Adminnemooseus
07-01-2010 12:51 PM


Thank you!
What's wrong with the Coffee House?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Adminnemooseus, posted 07-01-2010 12:51 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 63 of 124 (572129)
08-03-2010 11:52 PM


Is Christianity Polytheistic?
Is Christianity Polytheistic?
Please re-open. My reply to Straggler's message, Message 371 is as follows. I've been on the road, and still am and will continue to be, and things move really fast here... Please just paste my reply there if and when if gets re-opened:
quote:
Well it has been an uphill struggle but DA tipped it over the point of no return.
Because he's exposing your position as the untenable one?
Then you will be delighted to hear that this is not what I am doing.
Huh? Or is that right because your's is the "independent" one?
Hmmm. Whose classification are you imposing?
The generally accepted one that everyone else is using who is trying to tell you how retarded your's is.
Explain to me why it is "stupid" to suggest that we can apply a religion-independent use of the term "god" when objectively analysing the beliefs of biblical Christians? A religion-independent use of the term god that you yourself have applied on numerous occasions.
Because I'm using a super-set and you're using a sub-set. Its stupid because you're using your sub-set to encompasss the super-set, while I'm using the super-set to encompass the sub-set, like its supposed to be.
I guess that makes your responses "frivolous" then. For once it seems that we agree.
Oh you!
When has being frivolous ever stopped me? Examples please
From [msg=-372]:
Bob, delighted with his self defined atheist status (all the cool kids at school are atheists). takes you at your word and goes off to one of Dawkin's atheist camps full of confidence.
There he confidently reveals his belief in the one true glod knowing that he will find common conceptual ground with his fellow atheists.
Needless to say things don't work out too well for Bob.......
Well that's just a big old fat non-sequitor, now isn't it?
Consider this:
After Bob's initial "not working out", he finds solice with the animist, the Buddihist and all the other spiritual atheists, then he realizes that the camp wasn't an "atheist" one after all, but a "materialist" one instead.
Then he sends his spirit guide to bitch-slap Straggler for being such a tard... lulz

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by AdminPD, posted 08-04-2010 7:33 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 87 of 124 (596669)
12-16-2010 12:44 PM


Please reopen the War on Christmas thread so I can reply to the on topic portion of Message 212.

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by AdminPD, posted 12-16-2010 3:13 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 89 of 124 (596705)
12-16-2010 3:50 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by AdminPD
12-16-2010 3:13 PM


Re: War on Christmas Open
Thanks, I will.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by AdminPD, posted 12-16-2010 3:13 PM AdminPD has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 93 of 124 (622746)
07-06-2011 9:55 AM


Permissions
May I please have the necessary permissions to participate in the Intelligent Design forum?
Are there any other forums that I've lost permissions to participate in?

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by Admin, posted 07-06-2011 12:38 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 95 of 124 (622780)
07-06-2011 12:45 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by Admin
07-06-2011 12:38 PM


Re: Permissions
It wasn't the Intelligent Design forum that brought the worst out of me, it was the member I was responding to...
Out of curiosity, are you capable of limiting the permission of who people can reply to?
I don't see how limiting my participation in just one of the many forums helps enforce the rule.
I just want to reply to RAZD in the Who designed the ID designer(s)? thread.
abe
All of those insults were before the warning, and the last one I didn't mean to insult him personally.
Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by Admin, posted 07-06-2011 12:38 PM Admin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by Admin, posted 07-06-2011 2:30 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 97 of 124 (622795)
07-06-2011 2:36 PM
Reply to: Message 96 by Admin
07-06-2011 2:30 PM


Re: Permissions
Thanks Percy. I'll work on being nicer or just avoid responding when I can't.
Out of curiosity, are you capable of limiting the permission of who people can reply to?
Not at present, but this is on the todo list, as is limiting participation by thread instead of by entire forums.
A member blacklist would be cool too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by Admin, posted 07-06-2011 2:30 PM Admin has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024