Concerns for Percy

Percy:In my topic "Proof of God" the amount of rule snubbing while Admins are present stains the integrity of the Forum.If the situation in "Proof of God" was reversed the creo would of been promptly censored. Posts of disruption that claim facts while no evidence and source posted is rampant.What I say is not a matter of opinion, if it is denied then I know the EvC Forum is really saying "go somewhere else".Then there is the matter of creos like Ken Demeyer perpetually fastened with a ball and chain around their ankle in the form of banishment to FFA Forum. Why is Ken confined to one Forum with his "reply" function disabled ?Ken is a prolific asset to creo strength represented on this board,
yet he is in a constant state of detention.Percy, please free Ken !This is the internet - not North Korea.Whatever you decide (if anything) I support in advance, even if it adversely affects me. This is your house and I like it nonetheless.Thanks for your audience.sincerely,Willowtree

Nothing against Born to Preach, but, Percy expressed desire for a creationist to be an Admin not another evo.By defintion, a creationist is not an evolutionist, for purposes of this issue.Admin Truthlover already represents the evo/creo hybrid.

You are really conceding the fact that the current body of Admins cannot be any more objective, which means it is recognized that they are not as objective as they should be or a bone wouldn't need to be thrown to we creos.Believe it or not I really like every Admin except for two, even though one of these two suddenly and surprisingly intervened in my behalf not too long ago.I nominate Ken Demeyer.

Percy said he wanted a creationist Admin - not another evo Admin.It was also proposed that the creos pick and no one else.YOUR two choices are not pure creos, they are creo/evo hybrids.Nobody nominated you to decide for creos.I say whoever the evo Admins want then these are not the ones we creos want.You are engaging in the exact activity that necessitates the need for a creo Admin.

quote:

---

An added complication is that most/all of the current admins are very busy in the "real world" right now. The load of potential admin work has increased, and the admins time to do it has decreased.

---

Non sequitor.Everyone knows this. I totally respect the time you put into this effort.

quote:

---

While in some ways I have more power and control than any of the other moderators, that's simply because I'm the site owner and the programmer. That doesn't, in my mind, make me king of the moderators. I'm afraid I cannot help Ken with AdminAsgara. My suggestion to Ken is that he take AdminAsgara up on her offers to engage in a dialogue.

---

Percy:I believe you recently asked Ken to contribute to the invitation only "Columnist Corner".This invitation and Ken's perpetual state of detention does not match.Next issue:The Forum guidelines/rules say bare assertions are invalid. "Proof of God" contains the most bare assertions in any topic without a doubt. Yet, no Admin will do a damn thing. This fact is a compliment to the evidence because to acknowledge the evidence and sources is to acknowledge the validity of the claims.IF God does not exist then the rule scoffing betrays the fears.I will now drop it.WT

Does this personal rant have anything to do with the fact that I, in my: "What God thinks of Fundementalism" topic wiped the floor with Buzsaw's fundementalism from his home field - the Bible ?I argued directly from the Bible, arguments that have been there for two thousand years and Buz got whipped fair and square. Those arguments were from the mind of God/N.T. and Buzsaw finally got put in his place.

I have nominated Ken Demyer for this possible Admin position.But Ken has told me he will not be posting until at least September.Therefore, in lieu of this, I think the next best objective person is Berberry, therefore I nominate him.

please see previous post

Mike, the only reason I have not endorsed you per se is because Admin Truthlover already adequately represents the creo-evo hybrid. Another reason is because you recently "denigrated" the O.T. while implying that it is not the eternal word of God. By defintion, a creo believes the Bible to be the eternal word of God.IF a true creo is not elevated (no hybrid beliefs) THEN I would like to see the most objective person get it. I know my previous comment implies that a pure creo candidate is not the most objective, this is why I have nominated Berberry who I believe IS objective.By the hybrid standard I am technically one because I know evolution WITHIN animal species is a fact. (I said 'animal' not human) This micro-observance is assumed out into the macro (edit: by evos and therein is the "origin" of all the error.This message has been edited by WILLOWTREE, 07-04-2004 06:43 PM

All you actually did was rant and never did you take me on in the Bible.I humiliated and exposed fundementalism to be Abraham flupping a young girl in the tent and the product of that affair to be the subsequent persecution of Isaac by Ishmael who is the type of you fundies. This was Paul's exact argument from Genesis which the Holy Spirit revealed through him.You are just claiming the exact opposite of what actually happened while hiding behind this politically correct hate non sequitor which you adopted from atheist trolls who infected the debate.You fundies have turned the world off to Jesus. The debate is there for anyone to read.Go and read Matthew 13/parable of the good wheat and tares.This parable reveals WHY God allows you fundies to exist - so when the end comes the angels will THEN separate the good wheat (those who walk exclusively by faith) from the tares (those who the enemy empowers to exist among the good/works perverts)I challenge anyone to refute me from the Bible - verse by verse - something Buzsaw pretends to have done.

Ok Mike.I have to accept what you say at face value.I withdraw my criticism.

Percy:May I have access to my topic "What God thinks of Fundementalism" ?If not, could you transfer it to the FFA Forum ?Thanks,WT