Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Concerns for Percy
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 11 of 108 (118955)
06-26-2004 4:12 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by Admin
06-23-2004 10:59 PM


Admin writes:
One thing we've been missing for a while now is a Creationist moderator. We haven't had any since Tranquility Base and TrueCreation went civilian. Ideally there would be several Creationist moderators, but if we get one it's a start. Perhaps the Creationists here could make some nominations for the current moderator core to consider.
This is purely my opinion, and it is probably from my subjective doppelganger.
It is hard for me to imagine a non-biased admin. It doesn't matter what the admin believes in (creation or evolutions) as long as he is being objective when evaluating someone's post. Unfortunately, the great majority of creationists here tend to fall back to their subjective side when debating about certain issues. Thus, I ask the question. Can I (or anyone) truly believe that a person whose belief system being purely subjective can be objective in when evaluating people's posts?

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 06-23-2004 10:59 PM Admin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by AdminNosy, posted 06-26-2004 4:24 AM coffee_addict has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 16 of 108 (119019)
06-26-2004 1:20 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by AdminNosy
06-26-2004 4:24 AM


Re: evalutating
A-N writes:
mostly I don't think "evaluation" in a real detailed sense is required. Is it on topic is a common one?
To me, that is as scary. Just how often do you find creationists on here that are willing to answer your questions directly without dodging or trying to change the subject? Oh, wait, every damn time we talk about dates and dating, biblical issues, and evolution itself.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by AdminNosy, posted 06-26-2004 4:24 AM AdminNosy has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 23 of 108 (119260)
06-27-2004 4:25 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by NosyNed
06-27-2004 3:26 PM


Re: Mike gets a vote there too
Is it really fair if we put mike in though? Mike isn't exactly pure-blood creationist. He's a creationist-evolutionist hybrid.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by NosyNed, posted 06-27-2004 3:26 PM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by TrueCreation, posted 06-30-2004 12:02 AM coffee_addict has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 26 of 108 (119764)
06-29-2004 12:05 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by PecosGeorge
06-28-2004 11:39 PM


Re: I beg your pardon!
For a starter, you could start skipping an extra line to begin a new paragraph...
...like this.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by PecosGeorge, posted 06-28-2004 11:39 PM PecosGeorge has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 70 of 108 (122195)
07-05-2004 5:47 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by berberry
07-05-2004 3:32 AM


Re: Mike gets a vote there too
Hahahahahahaha! When I read WT's rec on you, I was really puzzled because I could have sworn your previous posts indicated that you was an evo.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by berberry, posted 07-05-2004 3:32 AM berberry has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024